首页> 外文OA文献 >Aggression and fire: The structure of antisocial behavior in firesetting and non-firesetting juvenile offenders
【2h】

Aggression and fire: The structure of antisocial behavior in firesetting and non-firesetting juvenile offenders

机译:侵略与火灾:纵火和非纵火少年犯中反社会行为的结构

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study examines the structure of antisocial behavior in 219 juvenile offenders. The study shows, through a series of nested model comparisons via confirmatory factor analysis, that reliable data on firesetting juvenile offenders (n = 85) best fits a three-factor model composed of overt, covert, and oppositional antisocial behavior. The same three-factor model also best fits the data for comparable non-firesetting juvenile offenders (n = 134). It is argued that results from this study support a conceptualization of firesetting as likely part of a pattern of developmentally advanced, persistent, antisocial behavior. Though the same general structure of antisocial behavior best fit the data for both groups, the firesetting group exhibited a significantly higher frequency and variety of antisocial acts. Finally, the present study illustrates and discusses the implications of large methods effects due to source of information (i.e., parent and child ratings) in typical measurement approaches to youthful antisocial behavior.
机译:这项研究调查了219名少年犯中反社会行为的结构。该研究表明,通过验证性因素分析进行​​的一系列嵌套模型比较,关于失火少年的可靠数据(n = 85)最适合由公开,秘密和对立的反社会行为组成的三因素模型。相同的三因素模型也最适合可比的非火力少年犯的数据(n = 134)。有人认为,这项研究的结果支持将火化概念化,将其作为发展性,持久性,反社会行为模式的一部分。尽管相同的反社会行为的一般结构最适合两组的数据,但火迷组的反社会行为的频率和多样性明显更高。最后,本研究说明并讨论了在青年反社会行为的典型测量方法中,由于信息来源(即父母和儿童的评级)而导致的大方法效果的含义。

著录项

  • 作者

    Stickle Timothy R.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2000
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号