首页> 外文OA文献 >QUESTIONING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION PARTICIPATION AND READING COMPREHENSION OF LEARNING DISABLED STUDENTS (CRITICAL THINKING, DISCUSSION GROUPS, BLOOM'S TAXONOMY).
【2h】

QUESTIONING STRATEGY INSTRUCTION PARTICIPATION AND READING COMPREHENSION OF LEARNING DISABLED STUDENTS (CRITICAL THINKING, DISCUSSION GROUPS, BLOOM'S TAXONOMY).

机译:学习障碍学生的问题策略教学参与和阅读理解(批判性思维,讨论小组,布卢姆分类法)。

摘要

Learning disabled students have been described as "inactive" learners. They have difficulty organizing their learning environment and seem to lack the awareness of a need to develop methods or strategies to help themselves in accomplishing tasks. Research suggests that learning disabled students are able to learn strategies. In examining the academic area where most of these students have the greatest difficulty, it was found that reading comprehension is the predominate area of need for remediation. The major purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of using a questioning strategy with learning disabled students to increase discussion participation and to increase reading comprehension. The study had a dual research focus: a teacher training component and a student component. Twenty randomly selected resource teachers were chosen to participate. One-half of these teachers were involved in a five weekend workshop course on questioning strategies where teachers learned how to ask higher cognitive level questions. The other half of the teachers received no training during the study. The 60 students were all learning disabled fifth and sixth graders having difficulty with reading, but reading at least on a third grade level. The data collection instrument TICOR, a mini-computer, was used to collect observational data reflecting student-teacher interaction (discussion) following the reading of a narrative story. The techniques taught to the students focused on the oral discussion. Written comprehension tests were administered before and after the workshops as well as one month later. It was found that there were significant differences between the two groups; the teachers in the workshops asked significantly higher cognitive level questions. As this group asked higher level questions, the students would respond with higher level answers. It was also found that there was no difference between the two groups in their performance on the written comprehension tests. Because of the emphasis on the oral discussion skills, this finding seems to demonstrate that learning disabled students have difficulty using strategies acquired through incidential learning and also have difficulty transferring oral skills to written tasks.
机译:学习障碍的学生被描述为“不活跃”的学习者。他们在组织学习环境方面有困难,并且似乎缺乏对开发方法或策略以帮助自己完成任务的意识。研究表明,学习障碍的学生能够学习策略。在研究其中大多数学生面临最大困难的学术领域时,发现阅读理解是需要补救的主要领域。这项研究的主要目的是研究对有学习障碍的学生使用提问策略来增加讨论参与和提高阅读理解的效果。该研究具有双重研究重点:教师培训部分和学生部分。随机选择了20名资源教师参加。这些教师中有一半参加了为期五周的关于提问策略的研讨会课程,在该课程中,教师学会了如何提出更高的认知水平问题。在研究期间,另一半的老师没有接受任何培训。这60名学生都是学习障碍的五年级和六年级学生,他们阅读困难,但至少读到三年级。数据收集工具TICOR是一台微型计算机,用于收集阅读叙事故事后反映学生与教师互动(讨论)的观察数据。向学生讲授的技术集中于口头讨论。书面理解测试在讲习班之前和之后以及一个月后进行。发现两组之间存在显着差异。研讨会上的老师提出了更高的认知水平问题。当这个小组提出更高层次的问题时,学生会以更高层次的答案做出回应。还发现两组在书面理解测试中的表现没有差异。由于强调口语讨论技巧,这一发现似乎表明学习障碍的学生很难使用通过偶然学习获得的策略,也难以将口头技巧转移到书面任务上。

著录项

  • 作者

    DIXON MARGARET ELECTA.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1983
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号