首页> 外文OA文献 >EVALUATION OF TREPANATION IN THE NEOLITHIC PERIOD BY 19TH CENTURY SCIENTISTS: AN OBJECT LESSON OF SOCIETAL BIAS IN RESEARCH
【2h】

EVALUATION OF TREPANATION IN THE NEOLITHIC PERIOD BY 19TH CENTURY SCIENTISTS: AN OBJECT LESSON OF SOCIETAL BIAS IN RESEARCH

机译:19世纪科学家对新时代的错PAN评价:社会偏见的研究对象教训。

摘要

Society shapes a great deal of our ideas and beliefs. No matter the field of research scientists choose to pursue, preconceptions exist that prevents them from being fully objective. To illustrate this point, this article explores the nineteenth century in order to highlight the subjective nature of the scientific community, specifically the neuroscientists at the time. It is my contention that society’s view of race interfered with their objective evaluation of the practice of trepanation in Neolithic times. Trepanation is a practice where a portion of the skull in removed from a living patient. Prominent among several scientists at the time, Paul Broca’s subjective approach to explaining the motivation behind the practice highlights how we are conditioned by our environment. This observation emphasizes the need to be aware of bias whenever we approach new information.
机译:社会影响着我们的思想和信念。无论科学家选择从事哪个研究领域,都存在使他们无法完全客观化的先入之见。为了说明这一点,本文探索了19世纪,以强调科学界(尤其是当时的神经科学家)的主观性质。我认为社会对种族的看法会干扰他们对新石器时代的铁腕行为的客观评价。敲击是从活着的患者身上取出一部分颅骨的做法。保罗·布洛卡(Paul Broca)当时在几位科学家中脱颖而出,以主观的方式解释了这种做法背后的动机,突显了我们如何受到环境的制约。该观察结果强调,每当我们获取新信息时都需要意识到偏见。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jalal Tamimi Tesneem Akram;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号