首页> 外文OA文献 >THE EFFECTS OF TWO COURSES, ASSESSMENT AND ADVISEMENT AND CAREER EXPLORATION ON ACADEMIC ORIENTATION, ACADEMIC MOTIVATION, AND LOCUS OF CONTROL IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS
【2h】

THE EFFECTS OF TWO COURSES, ASSESSMENT AND ADVISEMENT AND CAREER EXPLORATION ON ACADEMIC ORIENTATION, ACADEMIC MOTIVATION, AND LOCUS OF CONTROL IN COMMUNITY COLLEGE STUDENTS

机译:两种课程,评估与咨询和职业发展对社区大学生的学业定位,学业动机和控制位的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to measure the effects of two courses, Assessment and Advisement for Student Development and Career Exploration, on the academic orientation, academic motivation, and perceived locus of control on community college students. The study explored the correlation between internal locus of control and intrinsic motivation and between academic orientation and intrinsic motivation. Finally, the study tested the difference in academic orientation scores for those students who had and those who had not selected a college major but all of whom had completed the course Assessment and Advisement for Student Development. These two individualized, self-paced courses are taught for credit at Mesa Community College. The experimental hypotheses were focused around the following research problems. The first question was "Does completion of an individualized study guide in Assessment and Advisement for Student Development affect students' academic orientation, perceived locus of control, or their academic motivation?" The second research question asked, "Does completion of an individualized study guide in career exploration affect students' academic orientation, perceived locus of control, or their academic motivation?" The third question was "Does completion of the course Assessment and Advisement for Student Development have more effect on academic orientation, perceived locus of control, or academic motivation than completion of the course Career Exploration?" The fourth research question was "What relationships exist between the Academic Orientation scale of the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory and the Intrinsic Motivation Scale of the Merritt College Motivation Inventory?" The fifth research question asked, "What relationships exist between the Intrinsic Motivation scale of the Merritt Collge Motivation Inventory and the Rotter Locus of Control Scale?" The sixth research question asked, "Is there a difference in academic orientation scores measured by the Strong-Campbell Interest inventory for students who have and have not selected a college major and have completed the course Assessment and Advisement for Student Development?" The research designs used included a pretest posttest control group design for questions one, two, and three. A posttest only control group design was used for question six. A correlational study was done with questions four and five using pretest scores. The experimental condition was made up of eighty-four new student volunteers randomly assigned to two experimental groups and a control group. One group participated in the course Assessment and Advisement for Student Development, the second group participated in the course Career Exploration, and group three was the control group. The instruments used to measure the dependent variables were: The Merritt College Motivation Inventory, the Strong-Campbell Interest Inventory, and the Rotter Locus of Control Scale. The results of a t test for non-independent means revealed that Assessment and Advisement for Student Development did not significantly affect academic orientation scores but did increase intrinsic motivation and internal locus of control and decreased goal deficiency. Results of a t test for non-independent means revealed that Career Exploration significantly increased academic orientation, intrinsic motivation, self-enhancement, and internal locus of control. A t test for dependent means indicated that there was not a statistically significant difference in the effects of the two treatment groups. A Pearson Product-moment Correlation Coefficient was computed and an r test of significance was used to determine that there was a significant linear relationship between intrinsic motivation and academic orientation and between intrinsic motivation and internal locus of control.
机译:这项研究的目的是衡量两门课程,即对学生发展和职业发展的评估和咨询,对社区大学生的学术取向,学术动机和控制源的影响。该研究探索了内部控制源与内在动机之间的相关性,以及学术取向与内在动机之间的相关性。最后,该研究测试了那些选择大学专业但尚未选择大学专业但所有学生均已完成“学生发展评估和咨询”课程的学生的学术取向分数的差异。这两门个性化的,自定进度的课程在梅萨社区学院教授学分。实验假设集中在以下研究问题上。第一个问题是“完成《学生发展评估与咨询》中的个性化学习指南是否会影响学生的学习方向,感知的控制源或学习动机?”第二个研究问题被问到:“完成职业探索中的个性化学习指南会影响学生的学习方向,感知的控制源或学习动机吗?”第三个问题是“完成课程《学生发展的评估和咨询》是否比完成“职业探索”课程对学业取向,感知的控制源或学习动机有更大的影响?”第四个研究问题是“强坎贝尔兴趣量表的学术定向量表与梅里特大学动机量表的内在动机量表之间存在什么关系?”第五个研究问题提出:“梅里特大学动机量表的内在动机量表与控制量表的鹿特源之间存在什么关系?”第六个研究问题被问到:“对于选择和没有选择大学专业并且已经完成“学生发展评估和咨询”课程的学生,通过“强坎普贝尔兴趣”清单衡量的学术方向分数是否存在差异?”使用的研究设计包括针对问题一,问题二和问题三的测试前测试后对照组设计。第六题仅采用后测对照组设计。使用预测试分数对第四个和第五个问题进行了相关研究。实验条件由八十四名新的学生志愿者组成,这些志愿者被随机分为两个实验组和一个对照组。一组参加“学生发展评估与咨询”课程,第二组参加“职业探索”课程,第三组为对照组。用来测量因变量的工具是:梅里特大学动机量表,强坎贝尔兴趣量表和罗特控制点量表。非独立方式的t检验结果表明,“学生发展的评估和咨询”并未显着影响学业取向分数,但确实增加了内在动机和内部控制源,并减少了目标缺失。非独立方式的t检验结果表明,职业探索显着提高了学业导向,内在动机,自我增强和内部控制源。依赖性均数的t检验表明,两个治疗组的疗效在统计学上没有显着差异。计算了皮尔逊积矩相关系数,并使用显着性r检验确定内在动机与学习取向之间以及内在动机与内部控制源之间存在显着的线性关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mitchell Charlie Raymond;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1980
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en_US
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号