首页> 外文OA文献 >Self-reported embarrassment between Chinese, Chinese American, and Caucasian American college students.
【2h】

Self-reported embarrassment between Chinese, Chinese American, and Caucasian American college students.

机译:华裔,华裔美国人和白种人美国人大学生之间的自我报告的尴尬。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One purpose of this study was to determine if there were any differences in embarrassment between Chinese, Chinese American, and Caucasian American college students. A related purpose was to determine if there were any behavioral characteristics associated with embarrassment among the three groups. A total of 137 college students were given the Embarrassment Questionnaire (Modigliani, 1966) and the revised California Psychological Inventory (CPI; Gough, 1987). Three hypotheses were tested. The first: that there was no significant difference on the embarrassment questionnaire mean score between the three groups. The second: that there was no commonality in the kinds of embarrassing situations experienced by the three groups. The third: that there was no significant difference between the three groups in behavioral characteristics as measured by the CPI. The first hypothesis was tested using ANOVA. The three groups' mean scores on the embarrassment questionnaire were significantly different at the.05 level. The Chinese Americans were the least embarrassable. The Chinese were in the middle and the Caucasian Americans were the most embarrassable. This result may be related to how open or guarded the subjects were in responding to the questionnaire. The second hypothesis was tested using factor analysis. Because of the small sub-samples and the resulting factors accounting for 11% of the variance, it was concluded that there was no commonality in the kinds of embarrassing situations experienced by the three groups. With the third hypothesis ANOVA was used to test the significance of the differences between the three groups on the twenty scales of the revised CPI. The results suggest that the variance among the three groups was due to factors other than ethnicity.
机译:这项研究的目的之一是确定华裔,华裔美国人和白种人美国人大学生在尴尬方面是否存在差异。一个相关的目的是确定三组中是否有与尴尬相关的行为特征。共有137名大学生获得了《尴尬问卷》(Modigliani,1966年)和修订后的《加利福尼亚心理调查表》(CPI; Gough,1987年)。测试了三个假设。第一:尴尬问卷的平均得分在三组之间没有显着差异。第二:这三个小组所经历的那种尴尬情况并没有共同点。第三:根据CPI衡量,三组的行为特征没有显着差异。使用ANOVA检验了第一个假设。尴尬问卷上三组的平均得分在.05水平上有显着差异。华裔美国人最尴尬。中国人居中,白种人美国人最尴尬。该结果可能与受试者对问卷的开放程度或警惕性有关。使用因子分析检验了第二个假设。由于样本量较小,而导致的因素占方差的11%,因此得出结论,三类人遇到的那种尴尬情况不存在共性。对于第三个假设,ANOVA用于检验修订后CPI的20个量表上三组之间差异的显着性。结果表明,三组之间的差异是由于种族以外的因素引起的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Lee Sammy.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1993
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号