首页> 外文OA文献 >Who are our nomads today?: Deleuze's political ontology and the revolutionary problematic
【2h】

Who are our nomads today?: Deleuze's political ontology and the revolutionary problematic

机译:今天我们的游牧民族是谁?:德勒兹的政治本体论和革命问题

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This paper will address the question of the revolution in Gilles Deleuze's political ontology. More specifically, it will explore what kind of person Deleuze believes is capable of bringing about genuine and practical transformation. Contrary to the belief that a Deleuzian program for change centres on the facilitation of 'absolute deterritorialisation' and pure 'lines of flight', I will demonstrate how Deleuze in fact advocates a more cautious and incremental if not conservative practice that promotes the ethic of prudence. This will be achieved in part through a critical analysis of the dualistic premises upon which much Deleuzian political philosophy is based, alongside the udtopological triads that can also be found in his work. In light of this critique, Deleuze's thoughts on what it is to be and become a revolutionary will be brought into relief, giving rise to the question of who really is Deleuze's nomad, his true revolutionary or figure of transformation?
机译:本文将讨论吉尔斯·德勒兹(Gilles Deleuze)政治本体论中的革命问题。更具体地说,它将探讨Deleuze认为什么样的人能够带来真正和实际的转变。与认为德鲁兹的变革计划集中在促进“绝对地域化”和纯粹的“飞行路线”相反,我将证明德勒兹实际上是如何倡导更为谨慎和渐进的(如果不是保守的)提倡审慎伦理的实践。 。这将部分地通过对德鲁兹的许多政治哲学所基于的二元前提进行批判性分析,以及在他的作品中也可以找到的“乌托邦”三元组来实现。鉴于这种批评,德勒兹关于如何成为革命者的思想将得到缓解,从而引发了一个问题:德勒兹的游牧者究竟是谁,他真正的革命者或变革人物?

著录项

  • 作者

    Lundy C;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号