首页> 外文OA文献 >Decision making, cognitive distortions and emotional distress: a comparison between pathological gamblers and healthy controls
【2h】

Decision making, cognitive distortions and emotional distress: a comparison between pathological gamblers and healthy controls

机译:决策,认知失真和情绪困扰:病理赌徒与健康对照之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background and objectives: The etiology of problem gambling is multifaceted and complex. Among others factors, poor decision making, cognitive distortions (i.e., irrational beliefs about gambling), and emotional factors (e.g., negative mood states) appear to be among the most important factors in the development and maintenance of problem gambling. Although empirical evidence has suggested that cognitive distortions facilitate gambling and negative emotions are associated with gambling, the interplay between cognitive distortions, emotional states, and decision making in gambling remains unexplored. Methods: Pathological gamblers (N=54) and healthy controls (N=54) completed the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS), and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS-21). Results: Compared to healthy controls, pathological gamblers showed poorer decision making and reported higher scores on measures assessing cognitive distortions and emotional distress. All measures were positively associated with gambling severity. A significant negative correlation between decision making and cognitive distortions was also observed. No associations were found between poor decision making and emotional distress. Logistic regressi on analysis indicated that cognitive distortions, emotional distress, and poor decision making were significant predictors of problem gambling. Limitations: The use of self-report measures and the absence of female participants limit the generalizability of the reported findings. Conclusions: The present study is the first to demonstrate the mutual influence between irrational beliefs and poor decision making, as well as the role of cognitive bias, emotional distress, and poor decision making in gambling disorder.
机译:背景和目的:问题赌博的病因是多方面的,而且很复杂。在其他因素中,决策不力,认知失真(即对赌博的不合理信念)和情感因素(例如负面情绪状态)似乎是发展和维持问题赌博的最重要因素。尽管经验证据表明,认知扭曲有助于赌博,而负面情绪与赌博有关,但认知扭曲,情绪状态和赌博决策之间的相互作用尚待探索。方法:病理赌徒(N = 54)和健康对照组(N = 54)完成了南橡树赌博筛查(SOGS),爱荷华州赌博任务(IGT),赌博相关认知量表(GRCS)和抑郁焦虑压力量表(DASS-21)。结果:与健康对照组相比,病理赌徒的决策能力较差,并且在评估认知失真和情绪困扰的措施上得分更高。所有措施与赌博严重程度呈正相关。还观察到决策与认知失真之间的显着负相关。决策不力和情绪困扰之间没有关联。分析的逻辑回归表明,认知扭曲,情绪困扰和不良决策是问题赌博的重要预测因素。局限性:使用自我报告的措施以及女性参与者的缺席限制了所报告发现的普遍性。结论:本研究首次证明了非理性信念与不良决策之间的相互影响,以及认知偏见,情绪困扰和不良决策在赌博障碍中的作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号