首页> 外文OA文献 >Learning with worked-out problems in Manufacturing Technology: The effects of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts on acquired knowledge acquisition, near and far transfer performance
【2h】

Learning with worked-out problems in Manufacturing Technology: The effects of instructional explanations and self-explanation prompts on acquired knowledge acquisition, near and far transfer performance

机译:学习制造技术中已解决的问题:指导性解释和自我解释提示对获得的知识获取,远近转移绩效的影响

摘要

In the present research, two different explanatory approaches – namely, instructional explanation and self-explanation prompts – were applied in worked-out-problem-based learning (learning with worked-out problems) in a computer-assisted instructional environment in the domain of manufacturing technology. This research aims at comparing the effects of both explanatory approaches on topic knowledge acquisition, near transfer performance, and far transfer performance. Additionally, this research also attempts to examine the impact of topic interest on the aforementioned variables, in addition to the relationships between topic interest, mental effort, and learning outcomes. A total of 76 second-year students were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The pre- and post-tests were used to measure topic knowledge acquisition, near-transfer performance, and far-transfer performance, whereas topic interest and mental effort were measured by means of Topic Interest Questionnaire and NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) respectively. The analysis outcomes revealed that the self-explanation prompts approach was significantly superior to the instructional-explanation approach in terms of topic knowledge acquisition and near transfer performance. In addition, the results demonstrated that the impact of topic interest was significantly noticeable on far transfer tasks, but not on topic knowledge acquisition and near transfer tasks. On the other hand, the relationship between mental effort investment and test performance was not statistically significant. Finally, an equivocal relationship, which varied depending on the treatment conditions, was discovered between topic interest, mental effort, and test performance. (DIPF/orig.)
机译:在本研究中,两种不同的解释方法,即教学解释和自我解释提示,被应用于计算机辅助教学环境中基于问题解决问题的学习(学习有问题解决的问题)中。制造技术。本研究旨在比较两种解释方法对主题知识获取,近距离转移绩效和远距离转移绩效的影响。此外,除了主题兴趣,精神努力和学习成果之间的关系之外,本研究还尝试检查主题兴趣对上述变量的影响。总共76名二年级学生被随机分为实验组和对照组。前测和后测用于衡量主题知识的获取,近距离传输性能和远距离传输性能,而主题兴趣和精神努力则通过主题兴趣问卷和NASA任务负荷指数(NASA-TLX)进行衡量。分别。分析结果表明,自我解释提示方法在主题知识获取和近距离转移绩效方面显着优于指导解释方法。此外,结果表明,主题兴趣对远距离转移任务的影响显着,而对主题知识获取和近距离转移任务的影响则不明显。另一方面,精神投入与考试成绩之间的关系在统计上并不显着。最后,在主题兴趣,精神努力和测试表现之间发现了模棱两可的关系,该关系因治疗条件而异。 (DIPF /原件)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号