首页> 外文OA文献 >Visions and Versions of Governing Biomedicine: Narratives on Power Structures, Decision-making and Public Participation in the Field of Biomedical Technology in the Austrian Context
【2h】

Visions and Versions of Governing Biomedicine: Narratives on Power Structures, Decision-making and Public Participation in the Field of Biomedical Technology in the Austrian Context

机译:规范生物医学的愿景和版本:奥地利语境下生物医学技术领域的权力结构,决策和公众参与的叙事

摘要

In recent years, governance and public participation have developed into key notions within both policy discourse and academic analysis. While there is much discussion on developing new modes of governance and public participation, little empirical attention is paid to the public’s perception of models, possibilities and limits of participation and governance. Building on focus group data collected in Austria within the framework of a European project, this paper explores lay people’s visions and versions of government, governance and participation for two biomedical technologies: post-natal genetic testing and organ transplantation. Building on this analysis, we show that people situate their assessments of public participation against the background of rather complex lay models of the governance and government of the respective technology. Because these models are very different for the two technologies, participation also had very different connotations, which were deeply intertwined with each socio-technical system. Building on these findings we argue for a more technology-sensitive approach to public participation.
机译:近年来,治理和公众参与已发展成为政策论述和学术分析中的关键概念。尽管关于开发新的治理模式和公众参与的讨论很多,但很少有实证关注公众对模式和参与以及治理的可能性,局限性的认识。本文以欧洲项目框架内在奥地利收集的焦点小组数据为基础,探讨了人们对两种生物医学技术的愿景和政府,治理和参与的看法:产后基因检测和器官移植。在此分析的基础上,我们表明人们将公众对公众参与的评估放在相对复杂的相应技术的治理和政府布局模型的背景下。因为这两种技术的模型非常不同,所以参与也具有非常不同的含义,这些含义与每种社会技术系统都息息相关。基于这些发现,我们主张采用一种对技术更敏感的公众参与方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号