首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of Diagnostic Value of Sonourethrography with Retrograde Urethrography in Diagnosis of Anterior Urethral Stricture
【2h】

Comparison of Diagnostic Value of Sonourethrography with Retrograde Urethrography in Diagnosis of Anterior Urethral Stricture

机译:超声尿道造影与逆行尿道造影对前尿道狭窄的诊断价值比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

BACKGROUND: In spite of the advanced imaging methods, MRI and CT-Scan, the role of ultrasonography is still unique in some fields of genitourinary tract diseases.AIM: This study was aimed at assessing this role in the evaluation of male urinary stricture, and comparison with standard retrograde urethrography (SUG).METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. The patients include those who were suspected of anterior urethral stricture and were introduced assessed with imaging techniques (RUG). The patient underwent ultrasonography too. The results of both methods were compared. RUG was considered as the gold standard for this comparison.RESULT: Ninety-seven patients were studied. The mean age was 46.9 ± 11.7 years (range 21-88 years), in RUG, 22 patients (22.8%) and SUG 23 patients (23.7%) had a stricture, 3 cases with a stricture in RUG had not evidenced of stenosis in SUG. The mean length of urethral stricture in RUG was 12.9 ± 8.1 mm and in SUG was 8.1 ± 7.3 mm. The estimated length in RUG way was significantly higher than SUG way(P=0.025).The sensitivity and specificity in using of SUG were 86.6% and 94.6%, respectively.CONCLUSION: The result of this study showed stricture length measured by ultrasound is shorter than the length measured by RUG and the sensitivity and specificity in using of SUG was 86.6% and 94.6% respectively that due to the advantages it is an acceptable way.
机译:背景:尽管采用了先进的影像学检查,MRI和CT扫描技术,超声检查在泌尿生殖道疾病的某些领域仍然是独一无二的。目的:本研究旨在评估这种作用在评估男性尿道狭窄中的作用,以及与标准逆行尿道造影(SUG)的比较。方法:这是一项横断面研究。这些患者包括怀疑患有前尿道狭窄并经影像学检查(RUG)评估的患者。该患者也接受了超声检查。比较了两种方法的结果。 RUG被认为是该比较的金标准。结果:研究了97例患者。平均年龄为46.9±11.7岁(范围21-88岁),在RUG中有狭窄的22例患者(22.8%)和SUG有23例的患者(23.7%),在RUG中有3例狭窄的患者没有证据显示狭窄。 UG RUG的平均尿道狭窄长度为12.9±8.1 mm,SUG的平均长度为8.1±7.3 mm。 RUG方式的估计长度明显高于SUG方式(P = 0.025)。使用SUG的敏感性和特异性分别为86.6%和94.6%。结论:本研究结果表明,超声测量的狭窄长度较短RUG测得的长度和使用SUG的敏感性和特异性分别为86.6%和94.6%,由于其优点,这是一种可接受的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号