首页> 外文OA文献 >Gotham Skylines: The Intersection of Scènes à Faire and Fictional Facts In Comic Books, Graphic Novels, and their Derivative Works
【2h】

Gotham Skylines: The Intersection of Scènes à Faire and Fictional Facts In Comic Books, Graphic Novels, and their Derivative Works

机译:哥谭天际线:漫画,图画小说及其衍生作品中的科幻电影与虚构事实的交集

摘要

In just a decade and a half since the modern superhero film exploded onto the scene, the comic books and graphic novels that have long been the very definition of a fringe or niche interest, have morphed into a multi-billion dollar film, television and video game empire. The two main players in this industry, Marvel and DC, are owned by juggernauts in the entertainment industry. More importantly, some of these characters have been around for over three-quarters of a century. Readers keyed into intellectual property law, particularly copyright, should begin to see the issue. The copyright protection on these characters will expire in the coming years, and could potentially open up a wide range of other works based on these venerable and valuable properties. While trademark law may provide some limited protections, there may in fact be another way for these characters to be protected.There are several exceptions to copyright, but the one most applicable to our case is the prohibition against recognizing copyright protection for “Scènes à Faire.” Succinctly put, the doctrine prohibits copyrighting a scene that is indispensable to conveying basic information about the overall copyrighted work. In other words, using a skyline shot of New York City to convey that a film is set in New York City is not copyrightable on its own, even though the rest of the film is certainly eligible for protection. In a similar manner, facts may not be copyrighted. However, fictional facts may be. For example, the fact that Superman was born on the planet Krypton and sent to Earth as a baby to be raised in Smallville by the Kent family are ‘facts’ of a sort, but as fictional facts they are subject to copyright protection.The world of comic books is full of hypothetical questions regarding competing forces. Can Thor’s hammer (the irresistible force) destroy Captain America’s shield (the immovable object)? Who is faster, Superman or The Flash?In this mix we bring a legal conundrum to join the debates that swarm around conventions and online message boards. What happens when fictional facts interact with scènes à faire in the manner that occurs in films based on comic books? Which wins, the protectable nature of fictional facts or the generic scenes that are bereft of protection? In this note I will argue that when fictional facts interact with scènes à faire in comic book movies, the previously unprotected scenes gain copyright protectable status. While this may seem a moot point, it is not. The extensive protections offered by copyright will enable those copyright holders to continue exploiting the vast commercial value of those rights for decades to come.
机译:自从现代超级英雄电影爆炸出现以来的仅仅十五年时间里,长久以来一直是边缘或小众兴趣的定义的漫画书和图画小说已演变成价值数十亿美元的电影,电视和视频游戏帝国。该行业的两个主要参与者,Marvel和DC,由娱乐行业的巨头们拥有。更重要的是,其中一些角色已经存在了四分之三个世纪。着眼于知识产权法(尤其是版权)的读者应该开始看到这个问题。这些角色的版权保护将在未来几年内失效,并且基于这些古老而有价值的特性,有可能会开发出许多其他作品。虽然商标法可能会提供一些有限的保护,但实际上可能还有另一种方法来保护这些字符。版权有一些例外,但最适用于本案的是禁止承认“ScènesàFaire”的版权保护。”简而言之,该学说禁止对场景进行版权保护,这对于传达有关整体受版权保护作品的基本信息是必不可少的。换句话说,即使影片的其余部分肯定有资格获得保护,但使用纽约市的天际线镜头来传达影片是在纽约市拍摄的,本身并没有版权。以类似的方式,事实可能没有版权。但是,可能存在虚构事实。例如,超人出生于K星球上,并作为婴儿被肯特家族在Smallville抚养长大,这是一种``事实'',但作为虚构事实,它们受到版权保护。漫画中充满了关于竞争力的假想问题。索尔的锤子(无法抗拒的力量)会破坏美国队长的盾牌(不可移动的物体)吗?谁会更快,超人还是快闪?在这种混合中,我们带来了一个法律难题,加入了围绕公约和在线留言板的辩论。当虚构的事实以基于漫画书的电影中的方式与自然场景互动时,会发生什么?哪个胜出,虚构事实的可保护性或丧失保护的一般场景?在本说明中,我将争辩说,当虚构事实与漫画电影中的自由故事互动时,先前未受保护的场景将获得版权保护。尽管这似乎是有争议的,但事实并非如此。版权提供的广泛保护将使那些版权所有者能够在未来几十年中继续利用这些权利的巨大商业价值。

著录项

  • 作者

    Strube Gavin M.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号