Purpose- The aim of this study was to investigate the dimensions of housing adequacy evaluation by residents in public housing with a view to identifying how government and construction professionals can deliver adequate housing facilities.udDesign/Methodology/Approach- The research is based on household surveys involving 517 respondents selected from nine public housing estates constructed between 2003 and 2010 in Ogun State Southwest Nigeria. The data were collected using structured questionnaire administered to residents by the researchers through visits to the housing estates. A total of 33 variables derived from the review of literature were used in measuring housing adequacy Descriptive statistics and factor analyses were used in analysis of the data.udFindings- The study reveals that residents perceived their housing situation as inadequate. They evaluated housing adequacy based on four key dimensions: (i) ambient condition of interiors spaces, security, utilities and neighbourhood facilities (ii) social infrastructure (iii) level of privacy and size of sleeping, and (iv) seizes of living and dining areas in the residences. These dimensions of housing adequacy evaluation were found not to be exactly the same way experts conceived housing adequacy in the literature.udResearch Implications: The concept of housing adequacy can be used to examine occupants’ housing preferences and their standard of living; the quality of housing and performance of mass housing projects.udPractical Implications- The paper makes practical suggestions to government and construction professionals on how to improve adequacy levels of public housing. Specifically, in the areas of giving more attention to ambient condition of interiors, security, utilities and neighbourhood facilities as well as privacy; and sizes of main activities areas in dwelling unitsud2udin the design, construction and management of public housing projects.udOriginality/value- The study identifies dimensions of housing adequacy evaluation by residents in public housing and compares these with experts’ conception of housing adequacy.
展开▼
