首页> 外文OA文献 >The Natural Environment in the Selected Poems of John Keats and Niyi Osundare:an Eco-Critical Perspective
【2h】

The Natural Environment in the Selected Poems of John Keats and Niyi Osundare:an Eco-Critical Perspective

机译:约翰·济慈和尼伊·奥桑德雷诗歌选中的自然环境:生态批评的视角

摘要

The natural environment has progressively been endangered by the activities of man over the past decades. Attention was first drawn to this by the romantic poets who were alarmed by the obvious danger posed to nature by the dynamics of the Industrial Revolution. Several poets of succeeding epochs have sustained this concern in different ways. Previous studies explored the ways different poets engaged this concern with the natural environment. However, no study that we are aware of has taken into account the time-space divide between the nature-poets by which their works were nuanced. This study, therefore, underlined this time-space factor as it compared the nature poems of John Keats and Niyi Osundare. The aim was to show how the poets‘ spacio-temporal realities undergird their delineations of the natural environment in their poetry. The study used eco-criticism, an aspect of literary criticism, as its theory, and interfaced this with the comparative literary approach. Eco-criticism is the study of the relationship between literature and the natural environment, while comparative literature allows for an indepth study of parallels and divergences between the literary development of different nations and between two or more literatures. Thirty-six purposively selected poems by Keats and forty-four by Osundare are subjected to comparative and eco-critical analyses. This is because they are from distinct environments and periods and are also celebrated nature-poets whose works emphasized the particular and the universal, thereby making them appropriate for our nature of analysis. There is a steady decline in the romantic appreciation of the natural environment among nature poets: there is a shift of focus from its adulation to a seemingly more serious concern about its wanton exploitation and destruction. While Keats represented what Schiller called the ‗simple poet‘, Osundare represented the ‗sentimental poet‘. Keats‘ and Osundare‘s positions on the ‗art for art‘ and ‗art for life sake‘ respectively are distinguishing generation and poetic markers that determined our subsequent eco-discourse. Though Keats and Osundare celebrated nature‘s beauty, Osundare specifically uses his poems to chastise humanity and urge moral and social change in favour of the natural environment. The poets‘ particular environments influenced the form and style of their poetry. In addition, there was already in place a well established poetic tradition centred on the natural environment in Osundare‘s Nigerian agrarian environment long before any western contact. Also, there were more environmental challenges in the contemporary world than in Keats‘. Therefore, environment-related terms that were non-existent in Keats‘ days were emerging and Osundare had the singular advantage of acquiring and adopting a wider poetic horizon and content than Keats. The study examined how Osundare inter-textually connected with Keats‘ poetic vision of the environment and how this relationship initiated an environmental specific dialogue between the past and the present. It proposed a distinct class of investigation and practice which we label as eco-poetics and eco-wheels, respectively. Future research should consider a word-pool: collection and compilation of eco-friendly words and terms that are not pejoratives; and Grapho-poetics which is an inter-disciplinary discourse of painting/poetry, photography/poetry and architecture/poetry
机译:在过去的几十年中,自然环境逐渐受到人类活动的威胁。浪漫主义诗人首先注意到了这一点,他们对工业革命的动力给自然带来的明显危险感到震惊。成功时代的几位诗人以不同的方式维持了这种关注。先前的研究探索了不同诗人如何将这种关注与自然环境联系起来。但是,我们所知的研究还没有考虑到自然诗人之间细微差别的时空划分。因此,这项研究强调了这种时空因素,因为它比较了约翰·济慈和尼伊·奥桑达尔的自然诗。目的是展示诗人的时空现实如何加深他们对诗歌中自然环境的描绘。该研究以生态批评作为文学批评的一个方面作为其理论,并将其与比较文学方法联系起来。生态批评是对文学与自然环境之间关系的研究,而比较文学则允许深入研究不同国家的文学发展之间以及两种或两种以上文学之间的相似之处和分歧。济慈(Keats)精心挑选的三十六首诗和奥斯松德(Osundare)的四十四首诗经过了比较和生态批判性分析。这是因为它们来自不同的环境和时期,并且也是著名的自然诗人,其作品强调特定性和普遍性,从而使其适合于我们的分析性质。大自然诗人对自然环境的浪漫欣赏在不断下降:人们的关注焦点从对自然的迷恋转移到了对它的肆意剥削和破坏的更为严重的关注。济慈(Keats)代表席勒(Schiller)所谓的“朴素的诗人”,而奥松德(Osundare)则代表“感伤的诗人”。济慈(Keats)和奥松德(Osundare)在“以艺术为艺术”和“以生命为艺术”上的立场分别是世代和诗意的标志,它们决定了我们随后的生态论述。尽管济慈和欧松德赞扬大自然的美丽,但欧松德还是特别用他的诗歌来追求人类,并敦促道德和社会变革,以支持自然环境。诗人的特殊环境影响了他们诗歌的形式和风格。此外,早在与西方接触之前,就已经存在着建立良好的诗歌传统,其围绕着Osundare尼日利亚农业环境中的自然环境。而且,与济慈相比,当代世界面临的环境挑战更多。因此,济慈时代所不存在的与环境相关的术语正在兴起,而Osundare具有获得并采用比济慈更广阔的诗意视野和内容的独特优势。这项研究探讨了Osundare如何与济慈的环境诗意性相互联系,以及这种关系如何引发了过去与现在之间特定于环境的对话。它提出了不同的研究和实践类别,我们分别将其称为生态诗学和生态轮。未来的研究应考虑一个词库:收集和汇编非贬义词的环保词和术语;和Grapho-poetics,这是绘画/诗歌,摄影/诗歌和建筑/诗歌的跨学科论述

著录项

  • 作者

    Ayinuola F. I.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号