首页> 外文OA文献 >CFD Analysis of Nanorefrigerant through Adiabatic Capillary Tube of Vapour Compression Refrigeration System
【2h】

CFD Analysis of Nanorefrigerant through Adiabatic Capillary Tube of Vapour Compression Refrigeration System

机译:蒸气压缩制冷系统绝热毛细管对纳米制冷剂的CFD分析

摘要

Over time attempts have been made to understand the flow characteristics of refrigerants through capillary tubes as well as to seek more thermally efficient working fluids for refrigeration systems. This study investigated the flow of nanorefrigerants through adiabatic capillary tubes of vapour compression refrigeration systems; and afterwards creates numerical models that will account for solution of refrigerant side pressure drop and mass flow rate. Also in this study, a CFD flow analysis was carried out using a CFD simulation/solver such that the results of the simulations obtained were discussed so as to establish a distinction between the conventional and nano-refrigerants. Upon comparison of the CFD results of nanorefrigerants (CuR134a, CuR600a) and the conventional refrigerants (R134a, R600a), the conventional refrigerants were noticed to have more isothermal regions implying that heat was not being transferred quickly enough to raise the temperature of the adjoining region thus proving that the addition of nanoparticles improves the thermophysical properties of the base fluid. Also, based on the results of the study of the flow patterns of both working fluids, the density of pressure contours in the conventional refrigerants was far larger than that of the nanorefrigerant implying that more compressor work and ultimately greater power will be required. The findings from this study were validated with experimental results showing that a CFD analysis tool/method can be employed to understudy the phenomenal changes that take place in nano-refrigerant movement through capillary tubes without recourse to experimentation.
机译:随着时间的流逝,人们试图理解制冷剂通过毛细管的流动特性,并寻求用于制冷系统的热效率更高的工作流体。这项研究调查了纳米制冷剂通过蒸气压缩制冷系统的绝热毛细管的流动。然后创建数值模型,以解决制冷剂侧压降和质量流量的问题。同样在这项研究中,使用CFD模拟/求解器进行了CFD流量分析,从而讨论了获得的模拟结果,从而在常规制冷剂和纳米制冷剂之间建立了区别。在比较纳米制冷剂(CuR134a,CuR600a)和常规制冷剂(R134a,R600a)的CFD结果后,发现常规制冷剂具有更多的等温区域,这意味着热量传递得不够快,无法提高相邻区域的温度。因此证明纳米颗粒的添加改善了基础流体的热物理性质。而且,基于对两种工作流体的流动模式的研究结果,常规制冷剂中的压力轮廓密度远大于纳米制冷剂的压力轮廓密度,这意味着需要更多的压缩机工作,并最终需要更大的功率。这项研究的结果得到了实验结果的验证,表明CFD分析工具/方法可用于研究纳米制冷剂通过毛细管运动时发生的显着变化,而无需借助实验。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号