首页> 外文OA文献 >The Effectiveness of Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Strategy in Teaching Analytical Exposition Writing of the Second Graders Students at MAN Trenggalek
【2h】

The Effectiveness of Think-Talk-Write (TTW) Strategy in Teaching Analytical Exposition Writing of the Second Graders Students at MAN Trenggalek

机译:思维-谈话-写作(TTW)策略在MAN Trenggalek的二年级学生分析性写作写作教学中的有效性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Keyword: Effectiveness, writing ability, Think-Talk-Write (TTW), analytical exposition textudWriting is one difficult problem in English skill. When the students want to start to write, they are confused to express their idea. Think-Talk-Write (TTW) is one of strategies which suitable in teaching writing. Think-Talk-Write (TTW) includes think activities seen when the students read the text, then making a note about what they have read, talk activities occurs when students interact in groups to discuss the contents notes and write activities seen in the process of writing the results of think and talk. Think-Talk-Write (TTW) is used to develop writing and practicing the language fluently before writing.udResearch problems of this research were: 1) how is the students‟ ability in writing analytical exposition before being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy?, 2) how is the students‟ ability in writing analytical exposition after being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy?, 3) is there any significant different scores of the students‟ ability in writing analytical exposition before and after being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy?udThe purpose of this research were: 1) to know the students‟ ability in writing analytical exposition before being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy, 2) to know the students‟ ability in writing analytical exposition after being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy, 3) to know there is significant difference of the students‟ ability in writing analytical exposition before and after being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy.udThe research design in this research is pre-experimental research that uses one group pretest and posttest design in quantitative approach. The population of this research was all of second graders students of MAN Trenggalek. The sample was XI IPS 1 class consisting of 30 students. The sample was taken by using non probability sampling that is purposive sampling. The research instrument that was used is a writing analytical exposition test. Treatment that is used by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy. The data of this research is students score in pretest and posttest, and to analysis the data the researcher used paired sample t-test at SPSS program.udxudThe result of this research shows that the students score in writing analytical exposition before being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy is enough with the mean score 68.93. While the students‟ score in writing analytical exposition after being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy is good with the mean score 80.00. So, there is any significant difference of the students‟ ability in writing analytical exposition before and after being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy. The score after being taught by Think-Talk-Wrire (TTW) strategy is higher than the score before being taught by Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy. This research also show the result of Tcount was 5.189, whereas Ttable with significant level 5% was 2.045. This mean Tcount was higher than Ttable. So, it can be concluded that Ha which states that there is significant difference by using Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy to teach analytical exposition writing of the second graders students at MAN Trenggalek is accepted. Whereas, H0 which states that there is no significant difference by using Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy to teach analytical exposition writing of the second graders students at MAN Trenggalek is rejected. In other words, Think-Talk-Write (TTW) strategy can be used as an alternative for teaching writing.
机译:关键字:有效性,写作能力,口语表达(TTW),分析性论述文字 ud写作是英语技能中的一个难题。当学生想开始写作时,他们会困惑于表达自己的想法。言谈交流(TTW)是一种适合写作教学的策略。思维对话写(TTW)包括学生阅读课文时看到的思考活动,然后记下他们所阅读的内容,当学生分组讨论内容笔记并撰写在阅读过程中看到的活动时,谈话活动即发生写下思考与交谈的结果。 Think-Talk-Write(TTW)用于在写作之前流畅地发展写作和语言练习。 ud本研究的研究问题是:1)在接受Think-Talk-Write教授之前,学生如何撰写分析性论述(TTW)策略?,2)在接受“思维-对话-写作”(TTW)策略教学后,学生的写作分析能力如何?,3)学生的写作分析表达能力有显着差异本研究的目的是:1)在采用“想说-写-写”(TTW)策略进行教学之前,了解学生的写作分析能力。 2)知道学生通过Think-Talk-Write(TTW)策略教书后的分析论述写作能力,3)知道学生在Think Think教书法则之前和之后的书写分析志能力-对话写(TTW)分层 ud本研究中的研究设计是实验前研究,采用定量方法使用一组前测和后测设计。这项研究的人群全部是MAN Trenggalek的二年级学生。样本是XI IPS 1班,由30名学生组成。通过使用非概率抽样(目的抽样)获取样本。所使用的研究工具是笔迹分析博览会测试。言谈交流(TTW)策略使用的处理方法。这项研究的数据是学生在前测和后测中的得分,并且为了分析数据,研究人员在SPSS程序中使用了配对样本t检验。 udx ud研究结果表明,学生在被教之前写分析性论述得分Think-Talk-Write(TTW)的策略就足够了,平均得分为68.93。在通过“思考-对话-写作”(TTW)策略教书后,学生在写作分析性论述中的得分很高,平均得分为80.00。因此,在通过“思考-谈话-写”(TTW)策略进行教学之前和之后,学生在撰写分析性论述方面的能力存在显着差异。通过“思考-谈话-写作”(TTW)策略教课的分数要高于“通过思想-谈话-写”(TTW)策略教书的分数。该研究还显示,Tcount的结果为5.189,而显着性为5%的Ttable的结果为2.045。这意味着Tcount高于Ttable。因此,可以得出这样的结论:接受通过使用Think-Talk-Write(TTW)策略教授MAN Trenggalek的二年级学生的分析性论述写作的Ha表示存在重大差异。而H0则被拒绝,后者指出使用Think-Talk-Write(TTW)策略来教授MAN Trenggalek的二年级学生的分析性论述写作并没有明显差异。换句话说,“思考,对话,写作”(TTW)策略可以用作写作教学的替代方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Khusnatul Lailiyah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号