首页> 外文OA文献 >How accurate is triaxial RT3TM (RT3) accelerometer for estimating energy expenditure?
【2h】

How accurate is triaxial RT3TM (RT3) accelerometer for estimating energy expenditure?

机译:三轴RT3TM(RT3)加速度计估算能量消耗的精度如何?

摘要

The participants are instructed to remove the RT3 only for sleeping, bathing and swimming activities but some studies have shown the participants remove the accelerometer for longer times. The activities performed while the accelerometer is not being worn and, or energy that was not recorded during this time has never been estimated. This study aimed to assess compliance in using the accelerometer and quantify the energy expenditure (EE) not recorded by the accelerometer during the time it was not worn in free-living young males in a consecutive 4-day period. Eleven male participants 19 to 23 years of age, 54.7 to 85.5 kg with body mass index of 19.1 to 27.6 kg.m-2 completed the study. Resting metabolic rate was measured by indirect calorimetry. Daily EE estimation was on average 23.6% higher using the Bouchard Physical Activity Records than the RT3. Accelerometers were worn for 67 to 98% of waking hours but up to 30% of the EE was not recorded due to the device not being worn by participants mainly during intense physical activity. Recording the physical activity when the accelerometer is not being worn would provide a more precise estimative of the EE.
机译:指示参与者仅在睡觉,洗澡和游泳活动时删除RT3,但一些研究表明,参与者将加速度计删除的时间更长。在未佩戴加速度计的情况下执行的活动,或者从未估算过这段时间内未记录的能量。这项研究旨在评估使用加速度计的依从性,并量化连续4天未在自由活动的年轻男性中佩戴的加速度计未记录的能量消耗(EE)。 11名19至23岁,体重为54.7至85.5 kg,体重指数为19.1至27.6 kg.m-2的男性受试者完成了研究。静息代谢率通过间接量热法测量。使用Bouchard体力活动记录,每天的EE平均估算值比RT3高出23.6%。加速度计在醒来的67至98%时间内被佩戴,但由于参与者在激烈的体育锻炼中没有佩戴该设备,因此未记录高达EE的30%。在不佩戴加速度计的情况下记录身体活动将提供对EE的更精确估计。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号