首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploring the experience of Clinical Research Nurses working within acute NHS trusts and determining the most effective way to structure the workforce: A mixed methods study
【2h】

Exploring the experience of Clinical Research Nurses working within acute NHS trusts and determining the most effective way to structure the workforce: A mixed methods study

机译:探索在急性NHS信任范围内工作的临床研究护士的经验,并确定最有效的员工队伍结构:混合方法研究

摘要

Background The Clinical Research Nurse (CRN) workforce has developed alongside a growing National Health Service (NHS) research infrastructure. However, evidence suggests this workforce is isolated with minimal awareness in acute trusts of the work of CRNs. There is a lack of evidence concerning how best to structure CRN teams within acute trusts. Aim The overall aim of the study was to explore how the CRN workforce is currently organised within NHS Acute trusts, to explore the experience of CRNs working within acute NHS Trusts and determine the most effective way to structure this workforce. Methods A sequential mixed methods design was used. Phase 1 comprised a national online survey sent to Lead CRNs in acute NHS trusts and a statistical analysis of National Institute of Health Research study recruitment data over the period 2010-2016. The survey response rate was 77% (111/144). Survey analysis used descriptive statistics and thematic analysis. Phase 2 comprised four purposively sampled organisational case studies which included 14 semistructured interviews and 4 focus groups. Qualitative data were thematically analysed using NVIVO 10. Findings Over the last fifteen years the CRN workforce has evolved in a reactive and inconsistent manner, shaped by local and external influences. The effect of reviewing CRN workforce structures was found to have a statistically significant effect on recruitment into interventional studies. Lead CRNs have an important role in providing leadership and direction for the workforce and a link to clinical nursing colleagues. The current NHS climate means research delivery can be difficult and often overlooked as it is not perceived as a priority. The level of support and understanding from clinical nursing colleagues impacts CRN experience. Recommendations - Organisations should ensure the CRN workforce is well led with the establishment of a Lead CRN post. - A CRN workforce model is proposed to provide a suggested framework. - Work should be undertaken to address the lack of understanding of research and the CRN role. - R&D Departments should consider the timing of a full review of their CRN workforce. - Work is needed to understand the role of the emerging non nursing workforce within research. Conclusion Development of well-structured CRN teams supported by a local leader with formal links into internal stakeholders is key. Improving integration of the CRN workforce into existing organisational structures and processes will raise the profile of research and may facilitate a longer term shift in attitudes.
机译:背景技术临床研究护士(CRN)的员工队伍与不断增长的国家卫生服务(NHS)研究基础设施一起发展。但是,有证据表明,这些工作人员是孤立的,对CRN的工作非常信任。缺乏关于如何在急性信任中更好地组织CRN团队的证据。目的研究的总体目的是探讨目前在NHS Acute信托中如何组织CRN员工,探讨CRN在急性NHS信托中的工作经验,并确定构建这种员工队伍的最有效方法。方法采用顺序混合法设计。第1阶段包括向急性NHS信托中的主要CRN发送的全国在线调查,以及2010-2016年间美国国立卫生研究院研究招募数据的统计分析。调查答复率为77%(111/144)。调查分析使用描述性统计和主题分析。第二阶段包括四个有目的抽样的组织案例研究,其中包括14个半结构化访谈和4个焦点小组。使用NVIVO 10对定性数据进行了主题分析。结果在过去的15年中,CRN员工以反应性和不一致的方式发展,受本地和外部影响。研究发现,审查CRN劳动力结构对干预研究的招募具有统计学上的显着影响。首席CRN在为员工提供领导和指导以及与临床护理同事的联系方面发挥着重要作用。当前的NHS气氛意味着研究交付可能很困难,并且常常被忽视,因为它没有被视为优先事项。临床护理同事的支持和理解水平会影响CRN的经验。建议-组织应确保通过建立CRN领导职位来领导CRN员工。 -提出了CRN劳动力模型以提供建议的框架。 -应着手解决对研究缺乏了解和CRN角色的问题。 -研发部门应考虑对其CRN员工进行全面审查的时间。 -需要开展工作以了解新兴非护理人员在研究中的作用。结论在本地领导者的支持下建立结构良好的CRN团队并与内部利益相关者建立正式联系是关键。改善CRN员工与现有组织结构和流程的整合将提高研究的知名度,并可能促进态度的长期转变。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jones Helen Claire;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号