首页> 外文OA文献 >Strategic airline alliances and restrictions of competition by object under EU competition law
【2h】

Strategic airline alliances and restrictions of competition by object under EU competition law

机译:战略性航空联盟和欧盟竞争法规定的对象限制竞争

摘要

In this thesis, the question is asked whether, in the light of the ’more economic approach’ adopted in recent years, it is correct to classify metal-neutral revenue-sharing airline alliances as restrictive of competition by object and interpret this concept in a wider sense under Article 101(1) TFEU. By relying on the example and analysis of airline alliances and in particular metal-neutral revenue-sharing alliances, the thesis argues that the ’orthodox’ or wider interpretation of restriction by object is correct and, as such, does not contradict the idea behind the more economic approach of EU competition law. However, the analysis of restriction by object has to take into account the effects of Article 101 TFEU as a whole, including Article 101(3) TFEU. Therefore this wider interpretation of object restrictions must be complemented by a realistic application of Article 101(3) TFEU, in order to achieve the desired outcome of an administrable and efficient enforcement regime that minimises error costs. This is a legal thesis. It will review the EU competition law approach to airline alliances and use the example of airline alliances to explore the issue of restriction by object and its interaction with Article 101(3) TFEU. The thesis examines both from an economic and legal point of view all those aspects of strategic alliances, air transport and strategic airline alliances that are essential for a thorough understanding of their characteristics when analysed under Article 101(1) and 101(3) TFEU. The research question concentrates on the dichotomy of Article 101 TFEU, and it is concluded that the experience of the aviation industry supports the thesis.
机译:在本文中,提出了一个问题,即根据近年来采用的“更多经济方法”,将金属中立的收益共享航空公司联盟归类为对目标的限制竞争是否正确,并在一个概念中解释这一概念是否正确? TFEU​​第101条第1款具有更广泛的意义。通过对航空公司联盟,特别是金属中立的收益共享联盟的实例和分析,论文认为,“正统”或更广泛的对客体限制的解释是正确的,因此,与“联盟”背后的思想并不矛盾。欧盟竞争法更经济的做法。但是,按对象进行限制的分析必须考虑到TFEU第101条的整体影响,包括TFEU第101条第3款。因此,对对象限制的这种更广泛的解释必须以TFEU第101条第(3)款的实际应用为补充,以实现可管理且有效的执法制度的预期结果,从而将错误成本降至最低。这是一个法律论点。它将审查欧盟对航空公司联盟的竞争法方法,并以航空公司联盟为例探讨对象限制及其与TFEU第101条第3款的相互作用。本文从经济和法律角度考察了战略联盟,航空运输和战略航空公司联盟的所有方面,这些方面对于根据《 TFEU》第101条第1款和第101条第3款进行分析时,透彻了解其特性至关重要。研究问题集中在《欧盟条约》第101条的二分法上,得出的结论是航空业的经验支持了这一论点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Remetei-Filep Ádám;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号