首页> 外文OA文献 >Media reactions to the Panorama programme ‘Behind Closed Doors:Social Care Exposed’ and care staff reflections on publicity of poor practice in the care sector
【2h】

Media reactions to the Panorama programme ‘Behind Closed Doors:Social Care Exposed’ and care staff reflections on publicity of poor practice in the care sector

机译:媒体对Panorama计划“闭门造车:暴露了社会关怀”的反应,以及护理人员对宣传护理行业不良做法的思考

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PurposeThe aim of this paper is to present an analysis of media reactions to the BBC Television Panorama programme, Behind Closed Doors’ and to set this in the context of interviews with care staff about their reflections on publicity about poor practice in the care sector. Design/methodology/approachThis paper reports on an analysis of media reactions to recent exposes of abuse in social care in England and data from an interview based study of care workers. The interviews were analysed to consider the impact of such media reports on staff and to explore their views of action that might be need to be taken about care failings.FindingsThere are mixed reactions to exposes of poor care on television and to the debates that precede and follow their broadcast. Debates occur in print and on television, but also in social media. The particular expose of care home practices by the Panorama programme, Behind Closed Doors, led to debate in England about the potential role of covert cameras in care homes. The interviews revealed that while care staff are affected by scandals in the media about social care; they do not necessarily focus on themes that the media stories subsequently highlight. Overall some are disenchanted while others have ideas of what needs to change to improve practice. Care staff consider that there remain problems in raising concerns about practices and some staff feel unable to stay in workplaces where they have made complaints.Research limitations/implicationsThe care workers interviewed may not be representative of the sector and they may have wished to provide socially acceptable answers to the researchers. Practice was not observed. Originality/valueTelevision reports of problems with social care attract wide media interest but we know very little about how care workers respond to depictions of their work and their occupational grouping. This paper links media and expert commentator reactions to television exposes with data acquired from interviews with those on the frontline of care.
机译:目的本文的目的是对BBC电视台全景节目“闭门造车”的媒体反应进行分析,并在与医护人员进行访谈的背景下阐述他们对宣传护理行业不良做法的思考。设计/方法/方法本文报道了对媒体对英格兰最近发生的社会护理中的虐待事件的反应的分析,以及来自基于访谈的护理人员研究的数据。对访谈进行了分析,以考虑此类媒体报道对员工的影响,并探讨他们对于护理失误可能需要采取的行动的观点。发现在电视上以及在之前和之后的辩论中,人们对护理不善的曝光反应不一。跟随他们的广播。辩论发生在印刷品和电视上,但在社交媒体中也是如此。全景计划“闭门造车”(Back of Backed Doors)对养老院做法的特别曝光,引发了英国关于秘密摄像机在养老院中的潜在作用的辩论。访谈显示,尽管护理人员受到媒体关于社会护理丑闻的影响;他们并不一定要专注于媒体故事随后强调的主题。总体而言,有些人对此感到迷惑,而另一些人则对需要改进以改进实践的想法有所了解。护理人员认为,对操作习惯的担忧仍然存在问题,一些员工感到无法留在抱怨的工作场所。研究局限/含义受访的护理人员可能不是该部门的代表,他们可能希望提供社会认可的服务给研究人员的答案。没有观察到实践。原创性/价值关于社会护理问题的电视报道引起了媒体的广泛关注,但是我们对护理人员如何回应其工作描述和职业分组知之甚少。本文将媒体和专家评论员对电视曝光的反应联系起来,这些电视曝光来自从与前线医疗人员的访谈中获得的数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号