首页> 外文OA文献 >A UK ‘security-industrial complex’? : A reassessment of the origins, characteristics, and consequences of private sector involvement in the counter-terrorism aspects of contemporary UK national security strategy
【2h】

A UK ‘security-industrial complex’? : A reassessment of the origins, characteristics, and consequences of private sector involvement in the counter-terrorism aspects of contemporary UK national security strategy

机译:英国的“安全工业综合体”? :重新评估私营部门参与当代英国国家安全战略的反恐方面的起源,特征和后果

摘要

An argument has arisen that a ‘security-industrial complex’ (SIC) exists in, and is damaging to, the United Kingdom. The oft-repeated assessment is that, like the ‘military-industrial complex’ (MIC) which existed before (and continues to operate alongside) it, a damaging system of public-private sector interaction has emerged in the non-military aspects of national security strategy. Critics portray the purported system - the SIC - as an organised alliance of self-interested government and profit-making entities that exploits the security environment for its own gain.The suitability of using ‘SIC’ terminology is untested within security studies, however. This thesis reassesses how to conceptualise the public-private sector cooperation that has arisen in the contemporary security environment by analysing the origins, characteristics and consequences of the private sector’s involvement in the domestic counter-terrorism (CT) aspects of contemporary UK national security strategy following the terrorist attacks on the US on 11 September 2001. It demonstrates through reference to existing theory on the MIC, original interviews, and analysis of certain contracts and other case studies concerning companies’ involvement in the UK Government’s CT strategy that, instead of replicating the MIC in the new security context exactly, a more nuanced system of public-private interaction has arisen. Whilst some of the dynamics associated with the MIC exist in the CT sector, this thesis questions whether the aggregation of these dynamics in the CT field should be understood and presented in the same way.A lack of systemic scholarly research on ‘the SIC’ in the UK has hindered the development of policy-making and debate in respect of the private sector’s involvement in the non-military aspects of national security. The thesis seeks to address this gap, making an original, policy-orientated contribution, which aims to stimulate informed discussion and policy improvements in the field.
机译:有人争辩说,“安全工业综合体”(SIC)存在于英国并正在损害英国。经常重复进行的评估是,就像在其之前(并继续与其一起运作)的“军工联合体”(MIC)一样,在国家的非军事领域出现了破坏性的公私部门互动系统安全策略。批评者将所谓的SIC描述为自私的政府和营利性组织的有组织联盟,他们利用安全环境谋取自己的利益。但是,在安全研究中并未测试使用“ SIC”术语的适用性。本文通过分析私人部门介入当代英国国家安全战略的国内反恐(CT)方面的起源,特征和后果,重新评估了如何概念化在当代安全环境中出现的公私合作。它是2001年9月11日对美国的恐怖袭击。它通过参考关于MIC的现有理论,原始访谈以及对某些合同的分析以及与公司参与英国政府CT战略有关的其他案例研究来表明,而不是复制确切地说,在新的安全环境中,MIC已经出现了更为细微的公私互动系统。尽管与MIC相关的某些动力学存在于CT领域,但本论文提出质疑,是否应该以相同的方式理解和呈现这些动力学在CT领域的聚合。缺乏关于SIC的系统性学术研究。英国阻碍了有关私营部门参与国家安全的非军事方面的决策和辩论的发展。本文力图解决这一差距,做出原创性的,以政策为导向的贡献,目的在于激发该领域的知情讨论和政策改进。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rosemont Hugo David;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号