首页> 外文OA文献 >Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial):A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention With Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patients
【2h】

Cognitive Interventions and Nutritional Supplements (The CINS Trial):A Randomized Controlled, Multicenter Trial Comparing a Brief Intervention With Additional Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Seal Oil, and Soy Oil for Sick-Listed Low Back Pain Patients

机译:认知干预和营养补品(CINS试验):一项随机对照的多中心试验,对简短的干预与其他认知行为疗法,海豹油和豆油进行了简短的干预,比较了该病列为腰痛的患者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Study Design. A randomized controlled trial.Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a tailored and manualized cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) or nutritional supplements of seal oil and soy oil had any additional benefits over a brief cognitive intervention (BI) on return to work (RTW).Summary of Background Data. Brief intervention programs are clinically beneficial and cost-effective for patients with low back pain (LBP). CBT is recommended for LBP, but evidence on RTW is lacking. Seal oil has previously been shown to have a possible effect on muscle pain, but no randomized controlled trials have so far been carried out in LBP patients.Methods. Four hundred thirteen adults aged 18 to 60 years were included. Participants were sick-listed 2 to 10 months due to LBP. Main outcome was objectively ascertained work participation at 12-month follow-up. Participants were randomly assigned to BI (n ¼ 100), BI and CBT (n ¼ 103), BI and seal oil (n ¼ 105), or BI and soy oil (n ¼ 105). BI is a two-session cognitive, clinical examination program followed by two booster sessions, while the CBT program is a tailored, individual, seven session manual-based treatment.Results. At 12-month follow-up, 60% of the participants in the BI group, 50% in the BI and CBT group, 51% in the BI and seal oil group, and 53% in the BI and soy oil group showed reduced sick leave from baseline, and had either partly or fully RTW. The differences between the groups were not statistically significant (x2 ¼ 2.54, P ¼ 0.47). There were no significant differences between the treatment groups at any of the other follow-up assessments either, except for a significantly lower sick leave rate in the BI group than the other groups during the first 3 months of follow-up (x2¼ 9.50, P ¼ 0.02).Conclusion. CBT and seal oil had no additional benefits over a brief cognitive intervention on sick leave. The brief cognitive intervention alone was superior in facilitating a fast RTW.
机译:学习规划。一项随机对照试验。这项研究的目的是评估定制的和手动的认知行为疗法(CBT)或海豹油和豆油的营养补充剂是否比短暂的认知干预(BIW)重返工作(RTW)有任何其他好处。后台数据。对于腰背痛(LBP)的患者,简短的干预计划对临床有益且具有成本效益。建议将CBT用于LBP,但缺乏有关RTW的证据。海豹油先前已被证明可能对肌肉疼痛有影响,但迄今为止,尚未对LBP患者进行随机对照试验。其中包括413名18至60岁的成年人。参与者由于LBP而在2到10个月内病态列出。主要结果是在12个月的随访中客观地确定工作参与。参与者被随机分配到BI(n¼100),BI和CBT(n¼103),BI和海豹油(n¼105)或BI和豆油(n¼105)。 BI是一个分为两个阶段的认知临床检查计划,其次是两个加强阶段,而CBT计划是针对个人的,量身定制的,七个阶段的手动治疗方法。在12个月的随访中,BI组中60%的参与者,BI和CBT组中50%的参与者,BI和海豹油组中51%的参与者以及BI和豆油组中53%的参与者表明病情减轻了偏离基线,并且拥有部分或全部RTW。两组之间的差异无统计学意义(x2¼2.54,P¼0.47)。在其他任何随访评估中,治疗组之间也没有显着差异,除了在随访的前三个月中,BI组的病假率明显低于其他组(x2¼9.50,P ¼0.02)。结论。与短暂的病假认知干预相比,CBT和海豹油没有其他好处。单纯的短暂认知干预在促进快速RTW方面具有优势。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号