首页> 外文OA文献 >Victory and Strategic Culture:The Marines, the Army and Vietnam; First Corps Tactical Zone 1965-1971
【2h】

Victory and Strategic Culture:The Marines, the Army and Vietnam; First Corps Tactical Zone 1965-1971

机译:胜利与战略文化:海军陆战队,陆军与越南;第一军兵战术区1965-1971

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The Vietnam War has been subject of considerable research, both immediately after its conclusion and in more recent times in light of the new prolonged conflicts involving the United States armed forces. Yet, despite the considerable amount of published and unpublished material several assumptions have been accepted without the necessary criticism. One of these assumption is the fact that the US Army under General William C. Westmoreland was a static and unimaginative organization while the US Marine Corps had found the key to defeat the communist insurgency in Vietnam.The aim of this thesis is to examine this assumption in the context of the two services development before 1965 and of the conduct of their operations during the actual war. Examining the development of US counterinsurgency doctrine demonstrates that the US Army was not a passive spectator but took an active lead in the process. Furthermore there is no evidence that the US Marine Corps (USMC) was able to craft a war winning strategy in Vietnam and that its inability to operate in a combined arms and combined services environment damaged the overall effectiveness of the American war effort.These differences emerge from the fact that, contrarily to the common opinion, the USMC was the less flexible organization dominated by a close group of infantry officers while the Army, owing to its more complex make up, was able to operate with flexibility and efficiency crafting an effective method to fight in Vietnam.
机译:越南战争结束后立即进行了广泛的研究,鉴于最近发生的涉及美国武装部队的长期冲突,该研究在最近时期也进行了研究。然而,尽管已发表和未发表的材料数量很多,但在没有必要批评的情况下仍接受了一些假设。其中一个假设是,威廉·韦斯特莫兰德将军领导的美军是一个静态且缺乏想象力的组织,而美国海军陆战队则找到了战胜越南共产主义叛乱的关键。本文旨在研究这一假设。在1965年以前的两次兵力发展和实际战争中它们的运作进行的背景下。检查美国平叛理论的发展表明,美国陆军不是消极的旁观者,而是在这一过程中发挥了积极的带头作用。此外,没有证据表明美国海军陆战队(USMC)能够在越南制定制胜战略,并且无法在联合武器和联合服务环境中行动,这损害了美国战争努力的整体效力。由于与普遍看法相反,USMC是由一群步兵军官主导的较不灵活的组织,而陆军由于其组成较为复杂,因此能够灵活有效地运作在越南战斗。

著录项

  • 作者

    Velicogna Arrigo;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号