首页> 外文OA文献 >To what extent EU accession provide an opportunity for the nursing leadership in Croatia and Romania to advance a professional agenda? :A comparative case study using an ethnographic approach
【2h】

To what extent EU accession provide an opportunity for the nursing leadership in Croatia and Romania to advance a professional agenda? :A comparative case study using an ethnographic approach

机译:加入欧盟在多大程度上为克罗地亚和罗马尼亚的护理领导者提供了推进职业议程的机会? :使用民族志方法的比较案例研究

摘要

The thesis considers the views and experiences of nurse leaders and policy-makers on the use of EU accession as a policy window to advance a professional agenda in Romania and Croatia.The research question and objectives are designed to identify the policy context prior EU accession, the processes and mechanisms employed to achieve compliance with Directive 2005/36/EC, the nursing policy agendas and achieved legislative and professional outcomes. They are analytically located within the process of Europeanisation, EU accession policy, leadership, engagement and advocacy literature. The comparative findings are interpreted within this theoretical framework.The study adopted a qualitative approach using an ethnographic multi-method design involving interviews and documentary analysis of key EU accession primary source reports. My own positional was written into the account in a reflexive manner.The findings indicate that the nursing leadership used EU accession as a policy window to advance a professional agenda but the extent to which this opportunity was exploited differed in the case studies. Findings indicate the importance of regime specific conditions creating a set of constraints which differed in both cases. The Croatian case shows what could have been achieved through the use of TAIEX capacity building engaging stakeholders in agenda-setting. The Romanian nurse leadership failed to take advantage of the policy window prior to EU accession but the continued advocacy hold the Romanian government post-EU accession to account for its policy decisions. Although the new generation of nurses in Romania and Croatia comply with Directive 2005/36/EC, the nursing workforce which graduated prior to EU accession does not benefit from mutual recognition. It is concluded that the EU mechanisms to process compliance – peer review and capacity building – are not robust enough to strengthen free movement based on mutual recognition.The research findings contribute towards our understanding of the role of nursing in policy-making and the dynamics that drive policies outcomes. The research adds new knowledge to our understanding of the researched area and helps to position nursing within a broader context of EU enlargement.
机译:本文考虑了护士领导者和政策制定者关于将加入欧盟作为推进罗马尼亚和克罗地亚职业议程的政策窗口的观点和经验。研究问题和目标旨在确定加入欧盟之前的政策背景,遵守2005/36 / EC指令,护理政策议程并取得立法和专业成果的过程和机制。从分析上讲,它们位于欧洲化,欧盟加入政策,领导力,参与和倡导文献的过程中。比较结果在此理论框架内进行解释。本研究采用人种学多方法设计方法进行的定性分析,涉及访谈和对关键欧盟加入主要来源报告的文献分析。我自己的职务以反身的方式写到账上。研究结果表明,护理领导层将加入欧盟作为推进专业议程的政策窗口,但在案例研究中,利用这一机会的程度有所不同。研究结果表明,政权特定条件造成一系列限制的重要性,这两种情况都不同。克罗地亚的案例表明,通过利用TAIEX能力建设,使利益相关者参与议程制定,可以实现什么目标。罗马尼亚护士领导层未能在加入欧盟前利用政策窗口,但持续的倡导使罗马尼亚政府在加入欧盟后对其政策决定负责。尽管罗马尼亚和克罗地亚的新一代护士符合2005/36 / EC指令,但在加入欧盟之前毕业的护理人员队伍并未从相互认可中受益。结论是,欧盟处理合规的机制(同行评议和能力建设)不足以加强基于相互承认的自由流动。研究结果有助于我们理解护理在政策制定中的作用和动态。推动政策成果。该研究为我们对研究领域的理解增添了新知识,并有助于将护理定位在欧盟扩大的更广泛范围内。

著录项

  • 作者

    De Raeve Paul;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号