首页> 外文OA文献 >Can Psychological Interventions Reduce Perfectionism?:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
【2h】

Can Psychological Interventions Reduce Perfectionism?:A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

机译:心理干预能否减少完美主义?:系统评价和荟萃分析

摘要

Background: Perfectionism is implicated in a range of psychiatric disorders, impedes treatment and is associated with poorer treatment outcomes. Aims: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to summarize the existing evidence for psychological interventions targeting perfectionism in individuals with psychiatric disorders associated with perfectionism and/or elevated perfectionism. Method: Eight studies were identified and were analysed in meta-analyses. Meta-analyses were carried out for the Personal Standards and Concern over Mistakes subscales of the Frost Multi-Dimensional Perfectionism Scale (FMPS) and the Self Orientated Perfectionism and Socially Prescribed Perfectionism subscales of the Hewitt and Flett MPS (HMPS) in order to investigate change between pre and postintervention. Results: Large pooled effect sizes were found for the Personal Standards and Concern over Mistakes subscales of the FMPS and the Self Orientated Perfectionism subscale of the HMPS, whilst a medium sized effect was found for change in Socially Prescribed Perfectionism. Medium pooled effect sizes were also found for symptoms of anxiety and depression. Conclusions: There is some support that it is possible to significantly reduce perfectionism in individuals with clinical disorders associated with perfectionism and/or clinical levels of perfectionism. There is also some evidence that such interventions are associated with decreases in anxiety, depression, eating disorder and obsessive compulsive symptoms. Further research is needed in order to investigate the optimal dosage and format of such interventions as well as into specific disorders where there is a lack of evidence for their effectiveness.
机译:背景:完美主义与多种精神疾病有关,阻碍治疗,并与较差的治疗结果相关。目的:本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是总结针对与完美主义和/或高度完美主义相关的精神病患者进行针对完美主义的心理干预的现有证据。方法:鉴定了八项研究,并在荟萃分析中进行了分析。对弗罗斯特多维完美主义量表(FMPS)和休伊特和弗莱特MPS(HMPS)的自我导向的完美主义和社会规定的完美主义子量表的个人标准和对错误的分量表进行了荟萃分析,以研究变化干预前后之间。结果:对于FMPS的“个人标准和对错误的关注”量表和HMPS的“自我导向的完美主义”量表,发现了较大的合并效应量,而对于社会规定的完美主义的变化,发现了中等规模的效应。还发现焦虑和抑郁症状的中度合并效应量。结论:有一些支持认为,可以显着降低患有与完美主义和/或临床水平的完美主义相关的临床疾病的个体的完美主义。也有一些证据表明,此类干预与焦虑症,抑郁症,进食障碍和强迫症症状的减轻有关。为了研究此类干预措施的最佳剂量和形式以及缺乏有效证据的特定疾病,需要进行进一步的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号