首页> 外文OA文献 >A Framework of Executive Coaching Outcomes and a Meta-Analysis of Executive Coaching Effectiveness
【2h】

A Framework of Executive Coaching Outcomes and a Meta-Analysis of Executive Coaching Effectiveness

机译:高管教练结果的框架和高管教练效果的元分析

摘要

Objectives: To provide a framework in which outcomes of coaching can be classified and to present a meta-analysis that synthesizes the existing research on executive coaching effectiveness in order to understand the impact of coaching on work-based outcomes.udDesign: Meta-analysisudMethods: A review of the literature related to the distinction between effectiveness and evaluation; definitions of coaching effectiveness; and of training outcomes were conducted to create the framework of coaching outcomes. As a result of this review, a framework was suggested that classified coaching outcomes as either affective; behavioural/skill-based or results/performance. A further extensive literature search then identified 24 studies that matched our inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. These studies were coded on a variety of variables including the type of outcome (as proposed by our framework) and predictor variables including multi-source feedback; type of coach; coaching format and coaching technique. Hunter & Schmidt’s (1990, 2004) meta-analytic procedure was followed. udResults: Our findings indicate that executive coaching has a moderate to strong positive effect on outcomes, with the largest effect size for results/performance outcomes. Conclusions: The overall effectiveness of executive coaching varies depending on the type of outcome considered, however the effect sizes obtained for overall effectiveness (ranging from 0.33 to 0.57) can be classified as a medium to strong effect (Cohen, 1992). We believe that this result has positive implications for the effectiveness of coaching and the likely return on investment for organizations utilising coaching as a development method. This effect size appears to be comparable to those obtained for other types of organisational interventions.
机译:目标:提供一个框架,在该框架中可以对教练的结果进行分类,并提供一个荟萃分析,综合了有关高管教练有效性的现有研究,以便了解教练对基于工作成果的影响。 udDesign:元分析方法:对与有效性和评估之间的区别有关的文献进行回顾;教练效力的定义;并进行培训成果的建立,以建立教练成果的框架。审查的结果是,提出了一个框架,将教练结果归为情感性;行为/基于技能或结果/绩效。然后,进一步的广泛文献检索确定了24项符合我们荟萃分析纳入标准的研究。这些研究是根据各种变量编码的,包括结果的类型(由我们的框架提出)和包括多源反馈的预测变量。教练类型;教练形式和教练技巧。遵循了Hunter&Schmidt(1990,2004)的荟萃分析程序。 ud结果:我们的发现表明,高管教练对结果具有中等至强烈的积极影响,对结果/绩效结果的影响最大。结论:高管教练的总体效果取决于所考虑的结果类型,但是总体效果所获得的效果大小(范围从0.33到0.57)可以被分类为中等效果到强效果(Cohen,1992)。我们认为,这一结果对教练的有效性以及使用教练作为一种发展方法的组织的投资回报可能产生积极影响。这种效果的大小似乎与其他类型的组织干预所获得的效果相当。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号