首页> 外文OA文献 >The impact of low intensity specific and nonspecific strength-endurance training on submaximal work capacity in trained male rowers
【2h】

The impact of low intensity specific and nonspecific strength-endurance training on submaximal work capacity in trained male rowers

机译:低强度专项和非专项力量耐力训练对训练有素的男性赛艇运动员最大工作能力的影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the current study was to compare the effects of general strength endurance and specific strength endurance training cycle to rowing performance in highly trained male rowers. Twelve international and national level male rowers (21.25±1.76 years; height 188.3±4.92 cm; body mass 84.07±5.61 kg; training experience 7.38±2.70 years) took part in this investigation. The first group (n=6) performed low intensity strength endurance trainings using rowing ergometer for specific exercises (Specific group; S), and the second group (n=6) trained for strength endurance without rowing ergometer (Gymgroup; G). The experimental period lasted for four weeks. Stepwise incremental test was performed on the Concept II rowing ergometer (Morrisville, USA) before the first training week. After incremental ergometer test, subjects performed a constant 95% of Pa max test until exhaustion. This test was done 24 hours after incremental test and was performed before Week 1 and after Week 4. The stroke rates of the 95% Pa max test were not significantly different (p>0.05) between the two groups during both testing sessions. Despite the fact that both groups improved their 95% Pa max test results, no significant differences between the groups were found (p>0.05). However, test result was significantly improved only in G group (from 362±108 to 416.5±133 s), while no significant changes were observed in 95% Pa max test result in S group (from 372.8±132.3 to 442.3±153.1 s). No other significant differences were observed either between the two groups or between the two testing sessions (p>0.05). In conclusion, a 4 week non-specific strength endurance training program has an advantage over the specific strength endurance training on rowing ergometer in developing aerobic capacity in male rowers.
机译:本研究的目的是比较训练有素的男性赛艇运动员的一般力量耐力和特定力量耐力训练周期对赛艇性能的影响。参加这项国际和国家级别的十二位男性赛艇比赛(21.25±1.76岁;身高188.3±4.92 cm;体重84.07±5.61 kg;训练经验7.38±2.70岁)。第一组(n = 6)使用划船测功计进行低强度力量耐力训练,以进行特定锻炼(特定组; S),第二组(n = 6)进行无划船测功计的力量耐力训练(Gymgroup; G)。实验期持续了四个星期。在训练的第一个星期之前,对Concept II划船测力计(美国莫里斯维尔)进行了逐步增量测试。增量测力计测试后,受试者持续进行95%的Pa max测试,直至筋疲力尽。该测试在增量测试后24小时进行,并在第1周之前和第4周之后进行。95%Pa max测试的卒中率在两组测试期间两组之间无显着差异(p> 0.05)。尽管两组均改善了95%Pa max的测试结果,但两组之间没有发现显着差异(p> 0.05)。然而,仅G组的测试结果有显着改善(从362±108 s到416.5±133 s),而S组的95%Pa max测试结果没有观察到显着变化(从372.8±132.3到442.3±153.1 s) 。两组之间或两个测试阶段之间均未观察到其他显着差异(p> 0.05)。总之,为期4周的非专项力量耐力训练计划比划船测功仪上的专项力量耐力训练在培养男性赛艇运动员的有氧能力方面具有优势。

著录项

  • 作者

    Jaakson Elar; Mäestu Jarek;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号