首页> 外文OA文献 >Conventional and high-resolution heavy mineral analyses applied to flysch deposits : comparative provenance studies of the Ropianka (Upper Cretaceous–Paleocene) and Menilite (Oligocene) formations (Skole Nappe, Polish Carpathians)
【2h】

Conventional and high-resolution heavy mineral analyses applied to flysch deposits : comparative provenance studies of the Ropianka (Upper Cretaceous–Paleocene) and Menilite (Oligocene) formations (Skole Nappe, Polish Carpathians)

机译:常规和高分辨率重矿物分析应用于飞石沉积:Ropianka(上白垩统-古新世)和Menilite(渐新世)地层(Skole Nappe,波兰喀尔巴阡山脉)的比较物源研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Conventional and high-resolution analyses of heavy minerals from the gravity flow-deposited sandstones of the Campanian–Maastrichtian interval of the Ropianka (Upper Cretaceous–Paleocene) and Menilite (Oligocene) formations of the Polish Carpathians display similar compositions in terms of mineral species. Zircon, tourmaline, rutile, garnet, staurolite and kyanite belong to the main constituents in both formations. Apatite is common in the Ropianka Fm., while the Menilite Fm. almost lacks this mineral. Furthermore, individual hornblende grains were found in the Ropianka Fm., while andalusite is present only in the Menilite Fm. The Ropianka Fm. is relatively richer in zircon, tourmaline, garnet and apatite, while the Menilite Fm. contains more staurolite and kyanite. Zircon and tourmaline colour and morphological varieties are similar in both formations. The similarities of the heavy mineral assemblages studied suggest origin of these minerals from lithologically similar rocks. Negative correlations between the zircon + tourmaline + rutile (ZTR) values and the content of garnet and staurolite in the Ropianka Fm. may indicate, to a large extent, first-cycle delivery of garnet and staurolite to the formation. Negative, but low, correlation valid only for ZTR and garnet and positive correlations for ZTR and staurolite and kyanite in the Menilite Fm. suggest delivery of these minerals from sedimentary rocks or/and palimpsest sediments. The data obtained on mineral relationships and their morphology suggest mixed first-cycle and recycled provenance of the heavy minerals studied. Additionally, the first-cycle material input seems to be larger during the Ropianka Fm. sedimentation, while during the deposition of Menilite Fm. the contribution of material delivered from erosion of recycled sediments appears more prominent. The heavy mineral evidence suggests a change at the northern margin of the Skole Basin from an immature passive margin with a high relief during sedimentation of the Campanian–Maastrichtian part of the Ropianka Fm. to a mature passive margin with a low relief during sedimentation of the Menilite Fm.
机译:波兰喀尔巴阡山脉的Ropianka(上白垩统-古新世)和Menilite(渐新世)地层的Campanian-Maastrichtian区间的重力流沉积砂岩对重矿物的常规和高分辨率分析显示出相似的矿物成分。锆石,电气石,金红石,石榴石,星形石和蓝晶石是这两种岩层的主要成分。磷灰石在Ropianka公司中很常见,而Menilite公司中很常见。几乎缺乏这种矿物质。此外,在Ropianka Fm。中发现了单个角闪石晶粒,而红柱石仅在Menilite Fm中存在。 Ropianka Fm。锆石,电气石,石榴石和磷灰石含量相对较高,而Menilite Fm含量较高。包含更多的十字沸石和蓝晶石。锆石和电气石的颜色和形态变化在这两个岩层中都相似。研究的重矿物组合的相似性表明,这些矿物的来源是岩性相似的岩石。 Ropianka Fm中的锆石+电气石+金红石(ZTR)值与石榴石和星形石的含量之间呈负相关。可能在很大程度上表明石榴石和星形石的第一周期输送。负相关性低,仅对ZTR和石榴石有效,而对Menilite Fm中ZTR与星形石和蓝晶石呈正相关。建议从沉积岩或/和最暗沉的沉积物中输送这些矿物。有关矿物关系及其形态的数据表明,所研究的重矿物混合了第一循环和循环来源。此外,在Ropianka Fm期间,第一周期的物料输入似乎更大。沉积,而在Menilite Fm沉积期间。再生沉积物的侵蚀所带来的物质贡献似乎更为突出。大量的矿物证据表明,斯科普尔盆地北部边缘的一个不成熟的被动边缘发生了变化,而在Ropianka Fm的Campanian-Maastrichtian部分的沉积过程中,该边缘具有很高的起伏。到成熟的被动边缘,在Menilite Fm的沉积过程中浮雕低。

著录项

  • 作者

    Salata Dorota; Uchman Alfred;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2013
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号