It is essential to develop methodology for collection ofudinnovation data in the public sector. It pertainsudalso to monitoring the outputs and outcomes of manudagerial innovations. As the methodology must beudsensitive for public subsector specificity, this paperudis focused on public cultural institutions. Amongudseveral conceptual frameworks of effectivenessudthe accountability-based effectiveness has beenudrecognized as the most adequate to underlie investigating managerial innovation outcomes in publicudcultural institutions.udThe managerial innovation outcomes perceived by tudhe interviewed managers of Polish public culturaludinstitutions embraced three dimensions of accountudability-based effectiveness. This is accountability forudself-development of theudinstitution; developmentudof institution’s staff; and acting on the sake of theudaudience (customers) and local community. Manyudother dimensions were omitted. Hence, theudtriangulation of methods is highly recommended, asudthe interview, even in-depth one, is insufficient
展开▼
机译：开发用于收集公共部门 udinnovation数据的方法至关重要。它也与监视人文创新的产出和成果有关。由于该方法对于公共部门的特殊性必须是“不敏感的”，因此本文将重点放在公共文化机构上。在几个有效性概念框架中，以问责制为基础的有效性被公认为是最能用来调查公共 ud文化机构中管理创新成果的基础。 ud udhe采访过的波兰公共文化管理者所感知的管理创新成果审计机构包括基于账户审计能力的三个维度。这是对机构自身发展的责任；开发 udof机构的员工；并为了客户（客户）和当地社区采取行动。省略了许多其他尺寸。因此，强烈建议对方法进行三角化，因为即使是深度访谈也不足以进行访谈
展开▼
