首页> 外文OA文献 >Cost-Benefit Analysis, Discounting, and the Environmental Critique: Overloading of the Discount Rate?
【2h】

Cost-Benefit Analysis, Discounting, and the Environmental Critique: Overloading of the Discount Rate?

机译:成本效益分析,贴现和环境批判:贴现率超载?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The use of (high) discount rates in cost-benefit analysis is being criticized in the environmental debate. In particular, some feel that high future environmental costs do not get a fair hearing in a project appraisal due to the use of high discount rates. This paper explores first the relationship between the discount rate and environmental degradation. The link is ambiguous, though the overall effect of a lower discount rate may be more environmental friendly policies. Secondly, we discuss factors which should determine the discount rate according to economic theory, and to what extent environmental considerations can be brought into this framework. Finally, the paper briefly reviews other ways of bringing environmental considerations in the analysis, e.g. taking risk, uncertainty and irreversibility into account and including sustainability constraints. The conclusion is that the present tendency of overloading the discount rate should be avoided.
机译:在环境辩论中,人们曾批评在成本效益分析中使用(高)折现率。尤其是,有些人认为,由于使用高折现率,未来的高昂环境成本在项目评估中无法得到公正的听证。本文首先探讨折现率与环境恶化之间的关系。尽管较低的折现率的总体影响可能是对环境更友好的政策,但其联系尚不明确。其次,我们讨论应根据经济理论确定折现率的因素,以及在何种程度上可以将环境因素纳入该框架。最后,本文简要回顾了将环境因素纳入分析的其他方法,例如考虑到风险,不确定性和不可逆转性,包括可持续性约束。结论是应避免当前贴现率超负荷的趋势。

著录项

  • 作者

    Angelsen Arild;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1991
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号