首页> 外文OA文献 >Qualitative comparative analysis as a method for innovation research: analysing legal innovations in OECD countries
【2h】

Qualitative comparative analysis as a method for innovation research: analysing legal innovations in OECD countries

机译:定性比较分析作为创新研究的一种方法:分析OECD国家的法律创新

摘要

"The article presents Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as a method for innovation research. Based on set-theory, a key feature of QCA is the possibility to examine the necessary and the sufficient conditions for the institutionalisation of innovations. QCA aims to identify equifinal explanations for a social phenomenon, which consist of a combination of several conditions. This approach distinguishes QCA from qualitative and quantitative methods. Furthermore, QCA combines a comparative and a case-oriented approach, which is especially interesting for the analysis of innovations as context-sensitive and contingent phenomena. QCA as a research approach and method is outlined briefly, with special regard to the tasks of innovation research. Its application is presented in a study of the conditions for equal pay regulations in OECD countries. The analysis shows that the relevant actors for the institutionalisation of equal pay regulations are either women's movements or unions but that neither are solely sufficient for this legal innovation. Instead QCA also captures the context conditions for their impact on the enactment of equal pay regulations." (author's abstract)
机译:“本文介绍了定性比较分析(QCA)作为创新研究的一种方法。基于集合论,QCA的一个关键特征是有可能检查创新制度化的必要条件和充分条件。QCA旨在确定平等对社会现象的解释,它由多个条件组成,这种方法将QCA与定性和定量方法区分开来,而且QCA结合了比较分析和案例分析方法,这对于将创新作为上下文进行分析尤为有趣-简要概述了QCA作为研究方法和方法,特别关注了创新研究的任务,并在对OECD国家同工同酬法规的条件研究中介绍了QCA的应用,分析表明使同工同酬条例制度化的参与者是妇女运动或工会,但两者都不足以单独进行这项法律创新。相反,QCA还捕获了其对制定同工同酬条例的影响的上下文条件。”(作者的摘要)

著录项

  • 作者

    Laux Thomas;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2015
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号