首页> 外文OA文献 >Openness and closedness of the political systems that caused the Arab Spring
【2h】

Openness and closedness of the political systems that caused the Arab Spring

机译:导致阿拉伯之春的政治制度的开放性和封闭性

摘要

Most of the analysis of the Arab spring revolved around the immediate causes of the events and the role of social media in spreading the protests, in countries that succeeded in toppling their regimes. For this reason, this study adopts a different approach to tackle the long-term development of the Political opportunity structures that set the grounds for the emergence of these movements. To avoid the bias of focusing only on movements that succeeded, the paper compares the conditions of the emergence of the Egyptian movement that toppled the Mubarak regime in eighteen days, to the Moroccan movement that faded after a year of weekly protests. Instead of discussing the immediate context in which the movements appeared, or the course of events that the movements followed, the paper adopts a historical approach to review the pre-colonial, colonial and post-colonial historical, economic and political developments that created different structures of opportunity and threat in each of the two countries.
机译:在成功推翻政权的国家中,对阿拉伯之春的大多数分析都围绕事件的直接原因以及社交媒体在传播抗议活动中的作用。因此,本研究采用了不同的方法来应对政治机会结构的长期发展,这为这些运动的出现奠定了基础。为了避免只关注成功运动的偏见,该论文将埃及运动在18天后推翻了穆巴拉克政权的情况与摩洛哥运动在经历了一年的每周抗议后衰落的情况进行了比较。本文没有讨论运动出现的直接背景或运动发生的过程,而是采用历史方法来回顾创造不同结构的前殖民,殖民和后殖民历史,经济和政治发展。两国的机遇与威胁。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bouyahi Hamid;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号