首页> 外文OA文献 >The timing of family formation - a new approach : is the timing of parenthood a female decision?
【2h】

The timing of family formation - a new approach : is the timing of parenthood a female decision?

机译:家庭组建的时间-一种新方法:生育时间是女性的决定吗?

摘要

"Difficulties of achieving aims in career and family at the same time are considered to be an important issue for today's fertility decline. Since the 1970s career opportunities for women have become more attractive but the possibilities to combine career with existing family plans haven't been implemented sufficiently. On the other hand the time-intensive traditional idea about female family-care is widespread. For this reason, women have to decide to a stronger extent than men between their aims in family and vocational career. Theoretical Models, like the Expected Utility Model (Leibenstein, 1975) or the Theory of Planed Behaviour (Barber, 2001) assume that the costs and benefits of the different options are compared, and individuals decide for the most favourable of them - even though it can only be done insufficiently, since the costs and benefits are very complex and imponderable. On the basis of the traditional role ideas, parenthood is interconnected with considerable disadvantages especially for women (Beck and Beck-Gernsheim, 1995). According to these theories parenthood is delayed by women because of an unfavourable opportunity structure, while men hardly influence the decision. They only have the possibility to alter the basic conditions for women. Theories of this kind can well explain under which circumstances parenthood is postponed for the benefit of occupational aims. But it can not be deduced under which circumstances parenthood will be realised later in life nor are the costs of adjusting a salient aim included. Family formation even though the circumstances are not perfect or a postponing even though they are, can not be explained with existing theories. We assume that the decision to postpone parenthood or to realize it, is not only a question of incentives, but is also influenced by the risk to fail with individual life-plans. But how are different life-aims and incentives joined together – and how do they influence the decision for parenthood? In this paper, we use some developmental-psychological assumptions to present a new action theory, which gives us the 'missing link' between goal-attainment and (the perception) of incentives – and of course a deeper understanding on what is going on with families." (excerpt)
机译:“同时实现职业和家庭目标的困难被认为是当今生育率下降的重要问题。自1970年代以来,妇女的职业机会变得更具吸引力,但将职业与现有家庭计划相结合的可能性一直没有另一方面,关于女性家庭照料的时间密集的传统观念广为流传,因此,女性在家庭和职业生涯目标之间的决定权必须比男性更大。实用新型(Leibenstein,1975)或计划行为理论(Barber,2001)假设比较了不同选择的成本和收益,并且个人决定最有利于选择-即使只能做得不够充分,由于成本和收益非常复杂且难以理解,在传统的角色观念的基础上,父母身份与许多不利因素息息相关尤其是女性的年龄(Beck和Beck-Gernsheim,1995年)。根据这些理论,由于不利的机会结构,女性推迟了生育时间,而男性几乎没有影响决策。他们只能改变妇女的基本条件。这种理论可以很好地解释在什么情况下为了职业目标而推迟生育。但是,不能推断出在以后的情况下会实现父母身份的情况,也不能得出调整显着目标的成本。即使情况不是很完美,家庭的形成也不是这样。尽管如此,也不能用现有的理论来解释。我们认为,推迟或实现生育的决定不仅是激励问题,而且还受到个人生活计划失败的风险的影响。但是,不同的人生目标和动机如何结合在一起?它们又如何影响为人父母的决定?在本文中,我们使用一些发展心理学的假设来提出一种新的行动理论,该理论为我们提供了目标达成与激励(感知)之间的“缺失环节”,当然还有对发展过程的更深刻理解。家庭。”(节选)

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号