首页> 外文OA文献 >A forest convention - yes or no? Position paper for the BMZ on the state and the perspectives for creating a legally binding instrument for international forest policy
【2h】

A forest convention - yes or no? Position paper for the BMZ on the state and the perspectives for creating a legally binding instrument for international forest policy

机译:森林公约-是或否? BMZ关于国家和为国际森林政策创建具有法律约束力的文书的观点的立场文件

摘要

"The object of the present report was not to look more closely into the interfaces between the Rio conventions but to weigh the benefits of international cooperation based on conventions against other forms (e.g. bilateral development cooperation). The most important approach of bi- and multilateral development cooperation in the forest sector consists in national forest programs (NFPs), which are designed to achieve an integrated, interministerial course of action on sustainable forest management and forest protection in developing countries. Analysis of the NFPs has shown that the most important bottlenecks to their implementation must be sought in the inherent difficulties of integrated action. A forest convention could help to eliminatethese bottlenecks, as is shown by the experiences made in connection with other convention processes, where slow progress is being made with integrated action." (excerpt)
机译:“本报告的目的不是更仔细地研究里约公约之间的联系,而是权衡基于公约的国际合作与其他形式(例如双边发展合作)的利益。双边和多边的最重要方法森林部门的发展合作包括国家森林计划(NFP),其目的是实现发展中国家在可持续森林管理和森林保护方面的综合部际行动方案。必须在综合行动的内在困难中寻求其执行。森林公约可以帮助消除这些瓶颈,正如其他公约进程在综合行动方面进展缓慢的经验所表明的那样。” (摘抄)

著录项

  • 作者

    Scholz Imme;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2011
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号