首页> 外文OA文献 >The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes
【2h】

The Falls In Care Home study: a feasibility randomized controlled trial of the use of a risk assessment and decision support tool to prevent falls in care homes

机译:跌落护理院研究:使用风险评估和决策支持工具预防跌落护理院的可行性随机对照试验

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Objective:udTo explore the feasibility of implementing and evaluating the Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention.ududDesign:udTwo-centre, cluster feasibility randomized controlled trial and process evaluation.ududSetting:udPurposive sample of six diverse old age/learning disability, long stay care homes in Nottinghamshire, UK.ududSubjects:udResidents aged over 50 years, who had fallen at least once in the past year, not bed-bound, hoist-dependent or terminally ill.ududInterventions:udIntervention homes (n = 3) received Guide to Action Care Home fall prevention intervention training and support. Control homes (n = 3) received usual care.ududOutcomes:udRecruitment, attrition, baseline and six-month outcome completion, contamination and intervention fidelity, compliance, tolerability, acceptance and impact.ududResults:udA total of 81 of 145 (56%) care homes expressed participatory interest. Six of 22 letter respondent homes (27%) participated. The expected resident recruitment target was achieved by 76% (52/68). Ten (19%) residents did not complete follow-up (seven died, three moved). In intervention homes 36/114 (32%) staff attended training. Two of three (75%) care homes received protocol compliant training. Staff valued the training, but advised greater management involvement to improve intervention implementation. Fall risks were assessed, actioned and recorded in care records. Of 115 recorded falls, 533/570 (93%) of details were complete. Six-month resident fall rates were 1.9 and 4.0 per year for intervention and control homes, respectively.ududConclusions:udThe Guide to Action Care Home is implementable under trial conditions. Recruitment and follow-up rates indicate that a definitive trial can be completed. Falls (primary outcome) can be ascertained reliably from care records.
机译:目标: ud探讨实施和评估《行动护理之家跌倒预防干预指南》的可行性。 ud ud设计: ud两中心,集群可行性随机对照试验和过程评估。 ud ud设置: ud目标样本为六个 ud ud对象: ud过去50年以上的居民,过去一年至少摔倒过一次,不是卧床不起,依赖升降机或身患绝症的。 ud udInterventions: udIntervention房屋(n = 3)已收到《行动护理指南》中关于房屋跌倒预防干预的培训和支持。对照组(n = 3)得到了常规护理。 ud ud结果: ud招募,损耗,基线和六个月结果完成,污染和干预保真度,依从性,耐受性,可接受性和影响。 ud ud结果: ud总计145个疗养院中的81个(占56%)表达了参与兴趣。 22个回信者之家中有6个(占27%)参加了调查。预期的居民招募目标达到了76%(52/68)。十名(19%)居民未完成随访(七人死亡,三人搬家)。在干预院中,有36/114(32%)名工作人员参加了培训。三分之二(75%)的疗养院接受了符合协议的培训。员工重视培训,但建议更多的管理层参与以改善干预措施的实施。对跌倒风险进行评估,采取措施并记录在护理记录中。在记录的115起瀑布中,有533/570(93%)的详细信息已完成。干预和控制房屋的六个月居民跌倒率分别为每年1.9和4.0。 ud ud结论: ud《行动照护之家》指南可在试用条件下实施。招聘和跟进率表明可以完成确定的试验。跌倒(主要结果)可以从护理记录中可靠地确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号