首页> 外文OA文献 >Native Apps versus Web Apps: which is best for healthcare applications?
【2h】

Native Apps versus Web Apps: which is best for healthcare applications?

机译:本机应用程序与Web应用程序:哪种最适合医疗保健应用程序?

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Smartphone applications (Apps) provide a new way to deliver healthcare, illustrated by the fact that healthcare Apps are estimated to make up over 30% of new Apps currently being developed; with this number seemingly set to increase as the benefits become more apparent. In this paper, using the development of an In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) treatment stress study App as the exemplar, the alternatives of Native App and Web App design and implementa-tion are considered across several factors that include: user interface, ease of development, capabilities, performance, cost, and potential problems. Development for iOS and Android platforms and a Web App using JavaScript and HTML5 are discussed.
机译:智能手机应用程序(Apps)提供了一种提供医疗保健的新方式,这一事实说明了这一事实,即医疗保健应用程序估计占当前正在开发的新应用程序的30%以上;随着收益越来越明显,这个数字似乎将增加。在本文中,以体外受精(IVF)治疗压力研究应用程序的开发为例,在多个因素中考虑了本机应用程序和Web应用程序设计和实现的替代方案,这些因素包括:用户界面,易于开发,功能,性能,成本和潜在问题。讨论了针对iOS和Android平台以及使用JavaScript和HTML5的Web App的开发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号