首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison between a shakedown design approach and the analytical design approach in the UK for flexible road pavements
【2h】

A comparison between a shakedown design approach and the analytical design approach in the UK for flexible road pavements

机译:英国的柔性路面设计中的减震设计方法与分析设计方法之间的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Recently a shakedown approach has been proposed for structural design of flexible road pavements (Wang and Yu, 2013a). This new approach makes use of both elastic and plastic properties of materials, and therefore represents an advance from the existing analytical design approach in the UK where pavement life is related with elastic strains at critical locations using empirical equations. However, no direct comparison between designs using these two approaches has been made to date. In this paper, following a brief review of both approaches, the shakedown approach based on Wang and Yu (2013a) is used to design layer thicknesses for a typical asphalt pavement considered in the analytical approach TRRL Report LR1132. Typical values of plastic parameters are chosen for pavement materials at temperature 20°C, while stiffness moduli of materials are kept identical with the analytical design. The resulting shakedown designs are then compared with the thickness design chart using the analytical design approach. And the influence of temperature on the shakedown-based thickness design is also discussed in detail. It is found that if the shakedown design approach is conducted against the maximum wheel pressure at a relatively high temperature, the resulting pavement structure will probably not fail due to excessive rutting within the service life.
机译:最近,已经提出了一种减震方法用于柔性路面的结构设计(Wang和Yu,2013a)。这种新方法同时利用了材料的弹性和塑性特性,因此代表了英国现有分析设计方法的一项进步,该方法使用经验公式将路面寿命与关键位置的弹性应变相关联。但是,迄今为止,尚未对使用这两种方法的设计进行直接比较。在本文中,在对这两种方法进行了简要回顾之后,基于Wang和Yu(2013a)的减震方法被用于设计分析方法TRRL报告LR1132中考虑的典型沥青路面的层厚。为温度为20°C的路面材料选择塑性参数的典型值,同时使材料的刚度模量与分析设计相同。然后使用分析设计方法将最终的减薄设计与厚度设计图进行比较。并详细讨论了温度对基于减振的厚度设计的影响。发现如果在相对较高的温度下针对最大车轮压力进行减震设计方法,则最终的路面结构可能不会由于使用寿命内的过度车辙而失效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号