首页> 外文OA文献 >The emotional impact of verbal irony: eye-tracking evidence for a two-stage process
【2h】

The emotional impact of verbal irony: eye-tracking evidence for a two-stage process

机译:言语讽刺的情感影响:两个阶段的眼动追踪证据

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper we investigate the socio-emotional functions of verbal irony. Specifically, we use eye-tracking while reading to assess moment-to-moment processing of a character’s emotional response to ironic versus literal criticism. In Experiment 1, participants read stories describing a character being upset following criticism from another character. Results showed that participants initially more easily integrated a hurt response following ironic criticism; but later found it easier to integrate a hurt response following literal criticism. In Experiment 2, characters were instead described as having an amused response, which participants ultimately integrated more easily following ironic criticism. From this we propose a two-stage process of emotional responding to irony: Whilst readers may initially expect a character to be more hurt by ironic than literal criticism, they ultimately rationalise ironic criticism as being less hurtful, and more amusing.
机译:在本文中,我们研究了言语讽刺的社会情感功能。具体来说,我们在阅读时使用眼动追踪来评估角色对讽刺与直白批评的情感反应的瞬间处理。在实验1中,参与者阅读的故事描述了一个角色因受到另一个角色的批评而感到沮丧。结果表明,在具有讽刺意味的批评之后,参与者起初更容易整合伤害反应。但后来发现,在字面批评之后,整合伤害反应更为容易。在实验2中,角色被描述为具有有趣的响应,而在讽刺性批评之后,参与者最终更容易融入。据此,我们提出了一个对讽刺进行情感回应的两个阶段:尽管读者最初可能希望角色受到讽刺的伤害要比对文字的批评更多,但他们最终还是将讽刺批评归结为伤害更少,更有趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号