首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of crossover control mechanisms within single-point selection hyper-heuristics using HyFlex
【2h】

A comparison of crossover control mechanisms within single-point selection hyper-heuristics using HyFlex

机译:使用HyFlex在单点选择超启发式方法中的交叉控制机制比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Hyper-heuristics are search methodologies which operate at a higher level of abstraction than traditional search and optimisation techniques. Rather than operating on a search space of solutions directly, a hyper-heuristic searches a space of low-level heuristics or heuristic components. An iterative selection hyper-heuristic operates on a single solution, selecting and applying a low-level heuristic at each step before deciding whether to accept the resulting solution. Crossover low-level heuristics are often included in modern selection hyper-heuristic frameworks, however as they require multiple solutions to operate, a strategy is required to manage potential solutions to use as input. In this paper we investigate the use of crossover control schemes within two existing selection hyper-heuristics and observe the difference in performance when the method for managing potential solutions for crossover is modified. Firstly, we use the crossover control scheme of AdapHH, the winner of an international competition in heuristic search, in a Modified Choice Function - All Moves selection hyper-heuristic. Secondly, we replace the crossover control scheme within AdapHH with another method taken from the literature. We observe that the performance of selection hyper-heuristics using crossover low level heuristics is not independent of the choice of strategy for managing input solutions to these operators.
机译:超启发式搜索是比传统搜索和优化技术具有更高抽象层次的搜索方法。超启发式方法不是直接在解决方案的搜索空间上进行操作,而是搜索低级启发式方法或启发式组件的空间。迭代选择超启发式算法适用于单个解决方案,在决定是否接受结果解决方案之前,在每个步骤中选择并应用低级启发式算法。交叉低层启发式方法通常包含在现代选择超启发式框架中,但是,由于它们需要多个解决方案才能运行,因此需要一种策略来管理可能的解决方案以用作输入。在本文中,我们研究了在两个现有的选择超启发式方法中使用交叉控制方案,并观察了修改用于管理潜在交叉解决方案的方法时性能的差异。首先,我们在修改选择功能-All Moves选择超启发式算法中使用AdapHH的交叉控制方案,该方法是启发式搜索国际竞赛的获胜者。其次,我们用文献中的另一种方法代替AdapHH中的交叉控制方案。我们观察到,使用交叉低级启发式方法进行选择超启发式方法的性能并不独立于管理这些操作员的输入解决方案的策略选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号