首页> 外文OA文献 >Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): a measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking
【2h】

Development of the Critical Thinking Toolkit (CriTT): a measure of student attitudes and beliefs about critical thinking

机译:批判性思维工具包(CriTT)的开发:衡量学生对批判性思维的态度和​​信念

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Critical thinking is an important focus in higher education and is essential for good academic achievement. We report the development of a tool to measure critical thinking for three purposes: (i) to evaluate student perceptions and attitudes about critical thinking, (ii) to identify students in need of support to develop their critical thinking, and (iii) to predict academic performance. Seventy-seven items were generated from focus groups, interviews and the critical thinking literature. Data were collected from 133 psychology students. Factor Analysis revealed three latent factors based on a reduced set of 27 items. These factors were characterised as: Confidence in Critical Thinking; Valuing Critical Thinking; and Misconceptions. Reliability analysis demonstrated that the sub-scales were reliable. Convergent validity with measures of grade point average and argumentation skill was shown, with significant correlations between subscales and validation measures. Most notably, in multiple regression analysis, the three sub-scales from the new questionnaire substantially increased the variance in grade point average accounted for by measures of reflective thinking and argumentation. To sum, the resultant scale offers a measure that is simple to administer, can be used as a diagnostic tool to identify students who need support in developing their critical thinking skills, and can also predict academic performance.
机译:批判性思维是高等教育的重要重点,对于取得良好的学业成绩至关重要。我们报告了一种用于评估批判性思维的工具的开发,该工具可用于三个目的:(i)评估学生对批判性思维的看法和态度,(ii)识别需要支持以发展其批判性思维的学生,以及(iii)预测学业表现。从焦点小组,访谈和批判性思维文献中得出了77个项目。数据收集自133名心理学学生。因子分析揭示了基于减少的27个项目的三个潜在因子。这些因素的特征是:批判性思维的信心;重视批判性思维;和误解。可靠性分析表明,该子量表是可靠的。结果显示,与平均分和论证技巧的度量具有收敛性,子量表与验证度量之间具有显着相关性。最值得注意的是,在多元回归分析中,新问卷的三个子量表显着增加了平均分的方差,这是通过反思性思考和论证的方法得出的。总而言之,由此产生的量表提供了一种易于管理的度量,可以用作诊断工具,以识别在发展其批判性思维技能方面需要支持的学生,还可以预测学习成绩。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号