首页> 外文OA文献 >Investigating spatial guidance for a cooperative handheld robot
【2h】

Investigating spatial guidance for a cooperative handheld robot

机译:调查协作式手持机器人的空间导航

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In this paper we address the question of how to provide feedback information to guide users of a handheld robotic device when performing a spatial exploration task. We consider various feedback methods for communicating a five degree of freedom target pose to a user including a stereoscopic VR display, a monocular see-through AR display and a 2D screen as well as robot arm gesturing. The spatial exploration task with the handheld robot arm was compared against a baseline of a passive handheld wand. We compared the performance of each of the methods with 21 volunteers using a repeated measures ANOVA experimental design, and recorded users' opinions via a NASA Task Load Index Survey.The robot assisted reaching feedback methods significantly outperform manual reaching with the wand for all three visual feedback methods. However, there islittle difference between each of the three visual feedback methods when using the robot. The completion time of the task varies with changing difficulty whenusing the wand but remains stable when assisted by the robot. These results convey useful information for the design of cooperative handheld robots.
机译:在本文中,我们解决了在执行空间探索任务时如何提供反馈信息以指导手持式机器人设备的用户的问题。我们考虑了用于将五自由度目标姿势传达给用户的各种反馈方法,包括立体VR显示,单眼透视AR显示和2D屏幕以及机械手手势。将手持式机器人手臂的空间探索任务与被动式手持棒的基线进行了比较。我们使用重复测量方差分析实验设计,与21名志愿者比较了每种方法的性能,并通过NASA任务负荷指数调查记录了用户的意见。机器人辅助到达反馈方法在三个视觉方面均明显优于魔杖手动到达方法反馈方法。但是,使用机器人时,三种视觉反馈方法之间的差异很小。使用魔杖时,任务的完成时间会随着难度的变化而变化,但是在机器人的协助下,任务的完成时间会保持稳定。这些结果为协作手持式机器人的设计提供了有用的信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号