首页> 外文OA文献 >Does case management for patients with heart failure based in the community reduce unplanned hospital admissions?:A systematic review and meta-analysis
【2h】

Does case management for patients with heart failure based in the community reduce unplanned hospital admissions?:A systematic review and meta-analysis

机译:以社区为基础的心力衰竭患者的病例管理是否可以减少计划外的住院人数?:系统的回顾和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this systematic review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and controlled trials (NRCTs) is to investigate the effectiveness and related costs of case management (CM) for patients with heart failure (HF) predominantly based in the community in reducing unplanned readmissions and length of stay (LOS).  CM initiated either whilst as an inpatient, or on discharge from acute care hospitals, or in the community and then continuing on in the community.  Adults with a diagnosis of HF and resident in Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development countries.CM based on nurse co-ordinated multi-component care which is applicable to the primary care based health systems.Primary outcomes of interest were unplanned (re)admissions, LOS and any related cost data. Secondary outcomes were primary health care resources. Twenty-two studies were included: 17 RCTs and five NRCTs. Seventeen studies described hospital-initiated CM (n=4794) and five described community-initiated CM of HF (n=3832). Hospital-initiated CM reduced readmissions (rate ratio 0.74 [95%CI 0.60, 0.92] p=0.008) and LOS (mean difference -1.28 days [95%CI -2.04,-0.52] p=0.001) in favour of CM compared to usual care. Nine trials described cost data of which six reported no difference between CM and usual care. There were four studies of community-initiated CM versus usual care (2RCTs and 2NRCTs) with only the 2 NRCTs showing a reduction in admissions. Hospital-initiated CM can be successful in reducing unplanned hospital readmissions for HF and length of hospital stay for people with HF. Nine trials described cost data; no clear difference emerged between CM and usual care. There was limited evidence for community-initiated CM which suggested it does not reduce admission. No- High quality systematic review- Interventions examine nurse-led multicomponent care of heart failure patients- Focus on use of resources specific to heart failure- Community-initiated case management trials were limited in quantity and were mostly of low quality.- Lack of cost data in most trials
机译:对随机对照试验(RCT)和对照试验(NRCT)进行系统综述的目的是调查主要针对社区的心力衰竭(HF)患者的病例管理(CM)的有效性和相关费用,以减少计划外的再次入院和停留时间(LOS)。 CM是在住院期间或在急诊医院出院时或在社区中发起的,然后在社区中继续进行。诊断为HF的成年人,并且居住在经济合作与发展组织国家/地区.CM基于护士协调的多成分护理,适用于基于初级保健的卫生系统。录取,LOS和任何相关费用数据。次要结果是主要的卫生保健资源。包括22个研究:17个RCT和5个NRCT。十七项研究描述了医院启动的CM(n = 4794),五项描述了社区启动的HF的CM(n = 3832)。医院发起的CM降低了再入院率(比率0.74 [95%CI 0.60,0.92] p = 0.008)和LOS(平均差-1.28天[95%CI -2.04,-0.52] p = 0.001)相比CM日常护理。九项试验描述了成本数据,其中六项报告称CM与常规护理之间没有差异。有四项关于社区发起的CM与常规护理(2RCT和2NRCT)的研究,只有2项NRCT显示入院率降低。医院发起的CM可以成功地减少计划外的心衰住院率,并减少心衰患者的住院时间。九项试验描述了费用数据; CM和常规护理之间没有明显的区别。社区发起的CM的证据有限,这表明它不会减少入院率。否-高质量的系统评价-干预措施检查由护士主导的心力衰竭患者的多成分护理-专注于心力衰竭专用资源的使用-社区发起的病例管理试验数量有限且质量低下-缺乏成本大多数试验中的数据

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号