首页> 外文OA文献 >Crisis and opportunity:varieties of capitalism and varieties of crisis responses in Estonia and Slovenia
【2h】

Crisis and opportunity:varieties of capitalism and varieties of crisis responses in Estonia and Slovenia

机译:危机与机遇:爱沙尼亚和斯洛文尼亚的各种资本主义和危机应对对策

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A growing literature has analysed capitalist institutions in Slovenia and Estonia, two countries that have been described as different varieties of capitalism or even Antipodes within Central and Eastern Europe. Slovenia has been unique in Central and Eastern Europe given highly centralised wage bargaining and the importance of corporatist institutions, notably the tripartite Economic and Social Council. The Slovenian experience could be viewed as an exception to the general pattern of weak unions and illusory corporatism across Central and Eastern Europe. By contrast, Estonia is commonly viewed as a prime example of a free market-oriented economy, in which industrial relations are decentralised and capitalist institutions can be characterised as neoliberal or approximating a liberal market economy. This paper analyses how these distinctive institutional configurations have shaped the two countries' responses to the Great Recession or the Global Economic Crisis beginning in 2007-8. It also explores whether these institutions have remained stable or undergone changes as a result of the crisis. The article also seeks to identify lessons from this experience for the future prospects of corporatism and tripartism in Slovenia, Estonia and also for the revitalisation of trade unions and progressive politics in Central and Eastern Europe more generally.
机译:越来越多的文献分析了斯洛文尼亚和爱沙尼亚这两个国家的资本主义制度,这两个国家被描述为中欧和东欧不同的资本主义品种,甚至是对立的对立。斯洛文尼亚在中欧和东欧地区是独一无二的,这是由于高度集中的工资谈判和法人团体的重要性,尤其是三方经济及社会理事会。斯洛文尼亚的经历可以被视为中欧和东欧弱势联盟和虚幻的社团主义的普遍模式的例外。相比之下,爱沙尼亚通常被视为以自由市场为导向的经济的典范,在这种经济中,劳资关系是分散的,资本主义制度可以被描述为新自由主义或近似于自由市场经济。本文分析了这些独特的制度配置如何塑造了两国对2007年8月开始的大衰退或全球经济危机的反应。它还探讨了这些机构是否由于危机而保持稳定或发生了变化。本文还试图从这一经验中吸取教训,以期在爱沙尼亚斯洛文尼亚的社团主义和三方主义的未来前景,以及更普遍地振兴中欧和东欧的工会和进步政治。

著录项

  • 作者

    Feldmann Magnus;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号