首页> 外文OA文献 >Obstacle course: Users’ maneuverability and movement efficiency when using Otto Bock C-Leg, Otto Bock 3R60, and CaTech SNS prosthetic knee joints
【2h】

Obstacle course: Users’ maneuverability and movement efficiency when using Otto Bock C-Leg, Otto Bock 3R60, and CaTech SNS prosthetic knee joints

机译:障碍物路线:使用Otto Bock C腿,Otto Bock 3R60和CaTech SNS假肢膝关节时,用户的可操纵性和移动效率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The performance and movement efficiency of prosthesis users while traversing a multisectional obstacle course (OC) were evaluated using a crossover design with random allocation of three prosthetic knee joints: the SNS (CaTech; Dayton, Ohio) the C-Leg (Otto Bock; Duderstadt, Germany), and the 3R60 (Otto Bock). Twelve users completed the OC twice with each joint, once without and once with a mental loading task (MLT). The performance was objectively assessed using time measurement from digital video recordings, and the Total Heart Beat Index was used to estimate movement efficiency. A 1 mo familiarization period was provided for each knee joint before data collection. It took longer to complete the OC with the 3R60 compared with either the SNS or the C-Leg. No significant time differences were found between the C-Leg and the SNS, but differences between the 3R60 and the SNS (slalom and rock sections) and between the 3R60 and the C-Leg (rock section) were observed. Within the simulated sand section, two participants fell with the C-Leg, one with the 3R60, and none with the SNS. Movement efficiency without MLT was similar between all joints, but with an MLT a significant decrease in movement efficiency was observed with the C-Leg. Previous experience using an SNS had no influence on the results.
机译:使用交叉设计,随机分配三个假肢膝关节:SNS(CaTech; Dayton,Ohio),C腿(Otto Bock; Duderstadt),评估假肢使用者穿越多节障碍物路线(OC)时的性能和移动效率。 ,德国)和3R60(奥托博克)。十二个用户在每个关节处完成了OC两次,一次不进行,一次完成了心理负荷任务(MLT)。使用数字视频记录中的时间测量来客观评估性能,并使用总心跳指数来评估运动效率。在收集数据之前,为每个膝关节提供1个月的熟悉期。与SNS或C腿相比,用3R60完成OC花费的时间更长。在C-Leg和SNS之间没有发现明显的时间差异,但是观察到3R60和SNS(激流回旋和岩石段)之间以及3R60和C-Leg(岩石段)之间存在差异。在模拟的沙土段内,两名参与者被C型腿摔倒,一名参与者被3R60摔倒,而另一名参与者被SNS摔倒。在没有MLT的情况下,所有关节之间的运动效率都相似,但是在使用MLT的情况下,C腿的运动效率显着下降。以前使用SNS的经验对结果没有影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号