首页> 外文OA文献 >Development of a New OM Clinical Competency Evaluation Tool and Examination of Validity and Reliability Evidence
【2h】

Development of a New OM Clinical Competency Evaluation Tool and Examination of Validity and Reliability Evidence

机译:开发新的O&M临床能力评估工具并检验有效性和可靠性证据

摘要

The goal of this study was to create an evaluation tool that would be the new standard for evaluating clinical competencies of interns in the field of orientation and mobility (O&M). Using results from previous research in this area, specific competency skills were identified and the O&M Clinical Competency Evaluation Matrix (CCEM) was developed. O&M university faculty were surveyed to gather content evidence. After revisions were made to the O&M CCEM, the evaluation tool was piloted with O&M clinical internship supervisors and validity and reliability evidence was examined. The combination of all the validity evidence supported the intended inferences. The content evidence showed that experts in the field agreed that the O&M CCEM as a whole was representative of the content area. The internal structure evidence showed that scores on the O&M CCEM could be interpreted as measuring clinical competency in relation to standard teaching skills, O&M specific skills, and advanced O&M instruction skills. The external structure evidence showed that scores on the O&M CCEM are related to scores on the ACVREP evaluation form. The practicality evidence showed that the tool is useful for measuring clinical competence. In addition, the internal consistency reliability evidence showed that there was consistency in ratings within dimensions and the inter-rater reliability evidence showed there was moderate consistency in ratings between supervisors.
机译:这项研究的目的是创建一种评估工具,该工具将成为评估定向和流动性(O&M)领域实习生临床能力的新标准。利用该领域先前研究的结果,确定了特定的能力技能,并开发了O&M临床能力评估矩阵(CCEM)。对O&M大学的教师进行了调查,以收集内容证据。在对O&M CCEM进行修订后,该评估工具在O&M临床实习主管的指导下进行了测试,并检验了有效性和可靠性证据。所有有效性证据的组合支持预期的推论。内容证据表明,该领域的专家一致认为,O&M CCEM整体上是内容领域的代表。内部结构证据表明,O&M CCEM的分数可以解释为衡量与标准教学技能,O&M特定技能和高级O&M指导技能相关的临床能力。外部结构证据表明,O&M CCEM的分数与ACVREP评估表的分数有关。实用性证据表明该工具可用于衡量临床能力。此外,内部一致性可靠性证据表明,维度内的评级存在一致性,而内部评级者可靠性证据表明,主管之间的评级存在中等一致性。

著录项

  • 作者

    Renshaw Rebecca Lyn;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号