首页> 外文OA文献 >USING THE ABSORBED POWER METHOD TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENES OF SELECTED SEAT CUSHIONS DURING MANUAL WHEELCHAIR PROPULSION
【2h】

USING THE ABSORBED POWER METHOD TO EVALUATE EFFECTIVENES OF SELECTED SEAT CUSHIONS DURING MANUAL WHEELCHAIR PROPULSION

机译:使用吸收功率法评估手动轮椅推进过程中选定座垫的效率

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Although wheelchair users are constantly subjected to oscillatory and shock vibrations not much research has been conducted to assess the whole-body vibrations experienced by wheelchair users. Studies that have been published have only involved the testing of manual wheelchairs not interventions such as suspension or seating systems.The purpose of this study was to determine if selected wheelchair cushions reduce the amount of harmful whole-body vibrations transferred to wheelchair users and, if the absorbed power method a good measure of evaluating the whole-body vibrations.Thirty-two participants, who use a wheelchair as their primary mode of mobility, partook in this study. Four of the most commonly prescribed wheelchair cushions were selected. Participants were asked to propel their wheelchair over a simulated activities of daily living (ADL) obstacle course while acceleration and force data was collected.A repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant differences between the different cushions for the total averaged absorbed power (p = .190), the 50 mm curb drop (p = .234), or the rumble strip (p = .143). A repeated measures ANOVA for the peak curb drop absorbed power revealed a significant difference in the cushions (p = .043).The cushions that appeared to perform the best in this testing appear to be the Invacare Pindot and the Varilite Solo. Not only did those cushions appear to have the lowest values much of the time but did not display the highest values. Absorbed power appears to be just as effective at determining the effects of vibrations in the time domain as the prescribed methods of the ISO 2631 standard.
机译:尽管轮椅使用者经常受到振动和冲击振动的影响,但尚未进行太多研究来评估轮椅使用者经历的全身振动。已发表的研究仅涉及手动轮椅的测试,而不涉及悬架或座椅系统等干预措施。本研究的目的是确定选定的轮椅垫是否减少了传递给轮椅使用者的有害全身振动量,以及是否吸收功率法是评估全身振动的一种很好的方法。32位以轮椅为主要出行方式的参与者参加了本研究。选择了四个最常用的轮椅垫。在收集加速度和力数据的同时,要求参与者将轮椅推进模拟的日常生活(ADL)障碍路线活动.ANOVA的重复测量表明,不同软垫之间的总平均吸收功率之间无显着差异(p = .190 ),50毫米的路缘落差(p = .234)或隆隆声条(p = .143)。重复测量方差分析的峰值抑制吸收功率显示垫子之间存在显着差异(p = .043)。在此测试中表现最好的垫子似乎是Invacare Pindot和Varilite Solo。这些坐垫不仅在很多时候看起来具有最低值,而且没有显示最高值。吸收功率似乎在确定时域中的振动效果方面与ISO 2631标准的规定方法一样有效。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wolf Erik J;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2004
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号