首页> 外文OA文献 >“How do you think it went?”:udAn Exploratory Study of Cooperating Teacher Feedback about Preservice Teachers' Literacy Instruction
【2h】

“How do you think it went?”:udAn Exploratory Study of Cooperating Teacher Feedback about Preservice Teachers' Literacy Instruction

机译:“您认为情况如何?”: ud职前教师素养指导中合作教师反馈的探索性研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This study examines the nature of discourse about literacy instruction that occurs within the field placement. Using a comparative case study design within three first and second grade classrooms, participants conducted four read-aloud lessons over the duration of the study. Written and verbal post-lesson conference feedback were analyzed for evidence of discussion about high quality read-aloud instruction. The findings suggest that cooperating teachers provided limited feedback about literacy instruction; however, with the implementation of a feedback tool in the second phase of the study, post-lesson discussion with preservice teachers about the features of a high quality read-aloud lesson was more prevalent. These results suggest that cooperating teachers and preservice teachers may benefit from an explicit focus on feedback and that university supports in the form of a feedback tool may be one way to emphasize, and thus improve, knowledge about literacy instruction.
机译:这项研究探讨了在田野实习中有关扫盲教学的话语性质。通过在三个一年级和二年级教室中使用比较案例研究设计,参与者在研究期间进行了四次朗读课。分析了书面和口头的课后会议反馈,以获取有关高质量朗读教学的讨论证据。调查结果表明,合作教师对扫盲教学的反馈有限。但是,由于在研究的第二阶段实施了反馈工具,因此与职前教师就优质朗读课的特点进行的课后讨论更加普遍。这些结果表明,合作教师和职前教师可能会受益于对反馈的明确关注,而大学以反馈工具的形式提供支持可能是强调并因此而提高对识字教学知识的一种方式。

著录项

  • 作者

    Genest Maria T.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号