首页> 外文OA文献 >COPYRIGHT, FAIR USE, AND THE TEACH ACT: OPINIONS AND PRACTICES OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIES AND LIBRARIANS
【2h】

COPYRIGHT, FAIR USE, AND THE TEACH ACT: OPINIONS AND PRACTICES OF ACADEMIC LIBRARIES AND LIBRARIANS

机译:版权,合理使用和教学法:学术图书馆和图书馆员的意见和做法

摘要

Problem: The law of copyright in the United States represents a balancing of creative and commercial protection for copyright holders against the freedom and needs of others to use copyrighted resources including academic libraries, faculty, and students. Although a significant body of literature exists that describes and analyzes the course and mechanics of copyright through its long and storied history, few researchers have gathered statistics relating to academic librarians’ opinions concerning the efficacy of present-day United States copyright laws including the TEACH Act, their understanding of them, and their everyday resource use within the confines of these laws in the area of provision of digital resources. The views and practices of academic librarians are valuable in determining whether the TEACH Act is accomplishing its intended purpose of extending copyright exceptions beyond the classroom to digitally based academic course materials.ududMethodology: Based in grounded theory, data collection emanated from two sources – an online survey to all American academic members of the Association of Research Libraries and a content analysis of the websites of twenty-five randomly selected American academic members of the Association of Research Libraries.ududSummary of findings: Survey results indicate that academic librarians are dissatisfied with current copyright law and the realities of resource licensing. Fifty-four percent of the institutions in which the libraries are situated appear to be using the TEACH Act. Compliance with the Act’s requirements could not be definitively ascertained. The content analysis of websites indicate that a conflicting higher percentage of institutions are using the TEACH Act than what was reported through the survey. These perceived usages, however, could be the result of negligent linking to online information outside of the library’s own institution.ududConclusions: Academic institutions are utilizing the benefits of the TEACH Act. Suggestions for statutory revision are made based upon findings made in this study. ud
机译:问题:美国的版权法在版权持有人的创造性和商业保护与他人使用包括大学图书馆,教师和学生在内的版权资源的自由和需求之间取得了平衡。尽管存在大量的文献通过其悠久的历史描述和分析了版权的过程和机制,但很少有研究人员收集到有关学术图书馆员对当今美国著作权法(包括《教学法》)的效力的观点的统计数据。 ,他们对它们的理解以及他们在数字资源提供领域这些法律范围内的日常​​资源使用。学术图书馆馆员的观点和实践对于确​​定TEACH法案是否正在实现其将版权例外扩展到课堂以外以数字为基础的学术课程材料的预期目的非常有用。 ud ud方法论:基于扎根的理论,数据收集来自两个来源–对研究图书馆协会的所有美国学术成员进行的在线调查,并对二十五个随机选择的研究图书馆协会的美国学术成员的网站进行内容分析。 ud ud调查结果摘要:调查结果表明,学术图书馆图书馆员对当前的版权法和资源许可的现实不满意。图书馆所在机构中有百分之五十四似乎在使用《教学法》。不能确定是否遵守该法令的要求。网站的内容分析表明,与通过调查报告的机构相比,使用《教学法》的机构比例更高。但是,这些可能的用法可能是由于疏忽地链接到图书馆自身机构外部的在线信息所致。 ud ud结论:学术机构正在利用《教学法》的好处。根据这项研究的结果提出了法定修订的建议。 ud

著录项

  • 作者

    FOWLER PAMELA;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2012
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号