首页> 外文OA文献 >Learning to Write in Urban Elementary and Middle Schools: An Investigation of Teachers' Written Feedback on Student Compositions
【2h】

Learning to Write in Urban Elementary and Middle Schools: An Investigation of Teachers' Written Feedback on Student Compositions

机译:在城市中小学学习写作:教师对学生作文的书面反馈调查

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In writing instruction, feedback from teachers provides a critical opportunity for students to revise their work and improve as writers. Contexts in which students routinely receive feedback on their work include peer reviews and teacher-student conferences. For many teachers, however, written comments on student papers remain a significant method of response. Despite the importance of teacher responses to student work in facilitating the learning process, little research has examined the relationship between teacher feedback on early drafts of student work and the quality of students' subsequent drafts. Even less research has examined the nature of teachers' written feedback to students in K-12 settings. This study investigates the nature of written instructor responses to student writings and the relationship of these written responses to the quality of subsequent student work in urban elementary and middle schools. Most of the 22 instructors who provided the study's corpus of student writings (N = 114) provided their students with some written feedback, and most of their students incorporated that feedback into their subsequent drafts. Instructors tended to focus most on standardizing their students' written output, with measurable success. Student papers received little feedback about content or organization, and these qualities generally did not change over successive drafts.
机译:在写作教学中,老师的反馈为学生提供了重要的机会,使他们可以修改自己的作品并提高自己的写作能力。学生经常收到其工作反馈的上下文包括同行评议和师生会议。但是,对于许多教师而言,在学生论文上发表书面评论仍然是一种重要的回应方法。尽管教师对学生工作的回应在促进学习过程中很重要,但很少有研究研究教师对学生工作早期草稿的反馈与学生随后草稿的质量之间的关系。更少的研究调查了在K-12环境中教师对学生的书面反馈的性质。本研究调查了书面指导教师对学生作品的回应的性质,以及这些书面回应与城市中小学后续学生工作质量的关系。提供该研究的学生论文集的22位讲师中,大多数(N = 114)为他们的学生提供了一些书面反馈,并且大多数学生将这些反馈纳入了他们随后的草稿中。教师往往将重点放在标准化学生的书面输出上,并取得可衡量的成功。学生论文收到的关于内容或组织的反馈很少,并且这些质量在连续的草稿中通常不会改变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号