首页> 外文OA文献 >Rethinking Social Movement Participation and Non-Participation: How and Why South Dakota Pro-Choice Clergy Perceive, Confront, and Navigate Risks
【2h】

Rethinking Social Movement Participation and Non-Participation: How and Why South Dakota Pro-Choice Clergy Perceive, Confront, and Navigate Risks

机译:重新思考社会运动的参与和不参与:南达科他州亲选择的神职人员如何以及为什么感知,应对和应对风险

摘要

This paper challenges predominant assumptions and definitions presented in social movement literature about risk, activism, and social movement participation by examining the unique case of South Dakota pro-choice clergy. Whereas past research assumes that participation in social movement-related activities results in activist identity, this study shows that perceptions of risk, rather than social movement activities, determine whether or not these clergy join the social movement group, Pastors for Moral Choices, and whether or not they identify as activists. Further, I show that factors often credited with causing social movement participation may be the same factors used to justify not participating in social movements. Finally, I find that progressive clergy perceive multiple levels of risk within the conservative state of South Dakota, and they navigate these risks and advocate for reproductive rights by acting as "whistleblowers." Overall, this paper complicates social movement concepts and categories and seeks to challenge what is taken for granted in social movement research.
机译:本文通过考察南达科他州亲选择神职人员的独特案例,挑战了社会运动文献中有关风险,行动主义和社会运动参与的主要假设和定义。过去的研究假设参与社会运动相关活动会产生激进主义者的身份,但这项研究表明,风险意识而非社会运动活动会决定这些神职人员是否加入了社会运动团体“道德选择牧师”,以及是否他们是否认为自己是激进主义者。此外,我证明了经常被认为是导致参加社会运动的因素可能与用来证明不参加社会运动的因素相同。最后,我发现,进步的神职人员在南达科他州的保守州内察觉到多种风险,并且他们通过充当“举报人”来应对这些风险并倡导生殖权利。总体而言,本文使社会运动的概念和类别复杂化,并试图挑战社会运动研究中理所当然的事物。

著录项

  • 作者

    Burke Kelsy Conlin;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号