首页> 外文OA文献 >IMF STRUCTURAL CONDITIONALITY AND SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS: DETERMINANTS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION IN LABOR MARKET AND FINANCIAL SECTOR
【2h】

IMF STRUCTURAL CONDITIONALITY AND SPECIAL INTEREST GROUPS: DETERMINANTS OF PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION IN LABOR MARKET AND FINANCIAL SECTOR

机译:基金组织的结构状况和特殊利益集团:决定劳动力市场和金融部门执行计划的因素

摘要

What accounts for the differences in implementation of IMF programs across countries and across policy areas? Why do some countries are more effective in implementing IMF reforms than others, and in some policy areas than others? In this dissertation project, I argue that one of the most important sources of this heterogeneity in implementation lies in the strength of organized interests who are adversely affected by specific policies and their interaction with their governments. Specifically, I examine how partisan differences in the borrowing country governments and their electoral concerns mediate the effect of organized interests in the implementation of IMF reforms. Departing from common practice in the literature, I use a disaggregated approach to study implementation. With a novel global dataset, constructed from the Fund’s MONA database, I analyze implementation in two specific policy areas: labor market and financial sector reforms, in which preferences of organized interests and their linkages to the different partisan governments can be drawn from the existing literature. The results provide strong evidence regarding the interactive effect of special interests and partisanship. Analysis of the implementation of labor market reforms show that these reforms are driven by partisan preferences, electoral concerns and the interaction between the borrowing country governments and labor unions. When faced with an increasing number of strikes, left-wing governments are more likely to implement labor market reforms in non-election years than center/right wing governments. However, the left is less likely than the center/right to fulfill its international commitments when labor groups are militant during election years. Unlike labor market reforms, the effect of the financial sector is not necessarily mediated by the partisan politics and democratic institutions in the implementation stage due to lack of broader electoral appeal and mobilization capacity. The implementation of financial sector conditionality significantly goes down in the presence of strong financial interests, irrespective of the regime type and partisan ideology. This dissertation also provides two detailed case studies: the recent Fund programs in Ireland and Greece, focusing on the politics of reform in these countries and further highlighting the empirical findings.
机译:是什么解释了各国和各个政策领域在执行基金组织计划方面的差异?为什么有些国家在实施基金组织改革方面比其他国家更有效,为什么在某些政策领域比其他国家更有效?在本学位论文项目中,我认为,实施中这种异质性的最重要来源之一是有组织的利益的力量,这些利益受到具体政策及其与政府的互动的不利影响。具体来说,我研究了借款国政府中的党派分歧及其选举关注点如何在IMF改革实施中调解有组织利益的影响。与文献中的惯例不同,我使用分类的方法来研究实施。利用从基金组织的MONA数据库构建的新颖的全球数据集,我分析了两个具体政策领域的实施情况:劳动力市场和金融部门改革,在这些领域中,可以从现有文献中汲取有组织利益的偏好及其与不同党派政府的联系。研究结果为特殊利益和党派关系的互动作用提供了有力的证据。对劳动力市场改革实施情况的分析表明,这些改革是由党派偏好,选举关注以及借款国政府与工会之间的相互作用所驱动的。面对越来越多的罢工,左翼政府比中/右翼政府更有可能在非选举年度实施劳动力市场改革。但是,当劳工团体在选举年期间处于好战状态时,左派比中立/右派履行其国际承诺的可能性较小。与劳动力市场改革不同,由于缺乏广泛的选举吸引力和动员能力,在实施阶段,金融部门的影响并不一定由党派政治和民主机构来调节。无论制度类型和党派意识形态如何,在存在强大金融利益的情况下,金融部门附带条件的实施都会大大降低。本文还提供了两个详细的案例研究:爱尔兰和希腊最近的基金计划,重点是这些国家的改革政治,并进一步突出了实证研究结果。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gunaydin Hakan;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号